On 16 January 2009 at 0:52, Janina Sajka <janina(a)rednote.net> wrote:
I wouldn't. I don't know about whatever extra
noise damping they do.
I put an Acousti-Pak (same stuff they use) in a couple home built
computers. It's really great stuff. It's going in all my future
computers.
I can tell you that my Asus P3-PH5X is pretty darn
quiet, and
it was all stock parts bought from Newegg.
My last computer (until the CPU fan decided to get noisy when I had
to swap out a dead motherboard) was so quiet I could only tell it was
on by the light on the front. That's my target for "quiet".
The memory they're offering is on the slow side.
The cpu and hd are low
on cache memory. I think you can do better. Because I've been shopping,
some examples from Newegg this week:
A Core 2 Duo at 3.0 Ghz with 12 Mb L2 cache: $169
DDR3 1600 RAM around $130 for 2Gb, about half that for DDR2.
A 1Tb Hitachi sata drive with 32Mb cache for $79 after all the rebates.
Asus P3-PH5 for $179.
Yes, it seems I could do better. I'm trying to stay close to $1000US.
But, it also looks like I'm building a different version of about the
same power machine as my Athlon 64-X2. I thought maybe upgrading to
quad-core would be a nice upgrade. But really, my dual-core box only
benefits me when I compile software. I haven't found all that much
threading in apps yet. It might not be the right time for me to
upgrade. I was trying to take advantage of the drop in computer
prices.
I would maximze ram and cache to optimize performance.
The more you run
from ram instead of drive based swap, the better.
Agreed.
Thanks...
--
Kevin