Excerpts from Alexandre Prokoudine's message of 2011-02-23 18:45:55 +0100:
On 2/23/11, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
If it needs a social networking thing for some reason,
maybe diaspora
will do the trick? With diaspora chances are better that someone will
write a good user interface of some sort.
Yes, diaspora is much closer to what's required.
But the question is whether the whole writing stuff is necessary and
adds something. Social networks are general purpose, not special
purpose. Writing stuff there is additional effort.
It's a valid concern. Updating status of projects is the last thing
developers usually do. OTOH, twitting/denting about what they are up
to is a very, very usual thing, because these services make it so easy
to share and are rather tuned for sharing what's important in very
little time (140 symbols limit). So it's a question of implementation.
In other words: if you can't do something with few clicks, it won't
work :)
Email can work without clicks and is really easy. Maybe I'm just old
(I'm not), but I sure won't start twittering and don't even know what
denting is but we agree that it should be simple to keep others
informed.
Yes, a good idea IMO would be a service on top of
existing service
like github, twitter etc. They all expose API after all, no?
Each of those will be used by some people at most, so do you want to tie
them all together? Basing everything on a single service such as github
will force people to choose between exclusion or adoption of said
service, a really bad idea.
I wouldn't dream of basing on a single service. At the very least
Gitorious and Bitbucket have to be considered as well.
Then you have three big ones covered but leave out everyone who hosts
code himself or somewhere else. I don't think this is an optimal
solution.
Now, here is why rss, email et al don't do a good
work enough: they
don't provide perspective and they don't expose connections between
people right away.
There could be a catch-all mailinglist. For rss and the likes, there
are aggregators like planet (which is in use already, for example:
http://planet.linuxaudio.org/ [but includes stuff like Traktor...])
You mean Create Digital Music's feed? Personally I find CDM a great
resource for broadening horizons. Especially since Peter Kirn does
quite a bit of PR for Ardour, not mentioning their work on open source
hardware. I'd hate to see the community closed to things happening
outside it.
Nothing about CDM, I know that Peter Kirn covers free software, but
there are plenty of ways to get informed about commercial offerings on
other OSes, we don't need another one. This doesn't mean 'closing up to
the outside' but focusing on the task at hand.
I do think the traktor thing was just a mistake. Something seems wrong
on CDM's side, the Traktor thing is filed under
"Create Digital Music » Linux" and some MAX/MSP/Live stuff under "Create
Digital Music » open-source". Maybe
http://planet.linuxaudio.org/ would
be enough already if it was a bit moderated, better known and devs
blogging a bit more.