Re: [LAD] Drift compensation document

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 6:28 PM, benravin <ben.alex(a)outlook.com> wrote: Hi Ben, Please be aware of "top posting" - it is good manners to reply under a message, so the context of the reply is maintained. In response to your comments above, I will politely disagree. While a library or framework to do async messaging etc might be useful to some JACK users, it will certainly not benefit everybody. As such, it should be a separate project, and not demand that existing JACK users also have to deal with this extra complexity/functionality. Some googling will likely lead you to multiple frameworks or libraries that provide lock-free programming constructs like queues, FIFOs, locks etc. There's even a few old threads on this mailing-list[1] about it :) Regards, -Harry [1] http://lalists.stanford.edu/lad/2011/11/0150.html -- http://www.openavproductions.com