Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ot] [rant] gcc,you let me down one time too many - Linux-audio-dev

8 Jun 2005

I believe the C++ standard specifies that vector<> uses contigous memory and that
&v[0] returns a valid pointer to an array.

Taybin

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Cannam &lt;cannam(a)all-day-breakfast.com&gt;
Sent: Jun 8, 2005 4:41 PM
To: linux-audio-dev(a)music.columbia.edu
Cc: Jussi Laako &lt;jussi.laako(a)pp.inet.fi&gt;
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ot] [rant] gcc,	you let me down one time too many

On Wednesday 08 Jun 2005 21:35, Jussi Laako wrote:
...
  You can derive a new class from the template and
overload the []
 operator to perform exactly same as in C. After compilation the
 result is the same no matter if the template or C array is used. 
Are you sure this is still true in the gcc world, after they changed 
vector from an array to a real class in gcc 3.3 or whenever it was?

Chris