Hi all,
I have about a five and a half hour long concert I would like to burn as
audio on a DVD. I assumed that cdrdao or cdrecord would simply make an
"audio dvd" from the wav files, but that is not the case! My guess is
that there is something in the CDDA spec which prevents making an audio
CD over a certain length, because I get "illegal time code" errors from
cdrdao.
So, three questions:
1) Is there a way to master an "audio dvd" without encoding to a closed
DVD-A format? By this I mean a DVD disc with uncompressed audio which
can be played back by most CD/DVD combo players.
2) Failing this, I would be happy to simply burn a data DVD with the
tracks, but I want to make sure there are no gaps during playback
between the tracks [thus my idea to make a DAO "audio dvd"]. There are 7
tracks, each approx 50 min long, and each track continues directly into
the next. I do not have access to the original, continuous recording.
How could I get ecasound [or similar command line app] to append the
files together into one single, seamless file? Using a GUI app like
Rezound for this is just too cumbersome!
3) I am not sure if have a single 4 Gb wav file would cause playback
problems on a reasonably fast computer with a DVD drive. My intuition
says yes, however. What other options for seamless playback of almost 6
hours of sound do I have?
thanks much,
derek
Hello,
my radio programme about free software and contemporary composing, the LAD
in Karlsruhe and the "Wizards od Os"-Conference in Berlin
"- wo die Quellen offen liegen -
Freie Software und aktuelle Musik"
will be broadcasted on German State Radio
SWR2 on Nov 1st at 11 pm.
It includes interviews (from the LAD 2004) and music by
Ivica Ico Bukvic
Martin Rumori/Daniel Teige
Thomas Grill
Torsten Anders
Ludger Brümmer
Michel Koenders
Orm Finnendahl
I have to apologize to Fernando and Kjetil for not having included your
interviews and music, but I had to choose from more than 3 hours of
material, where I had - for a German programme - to concentrate on German
native speakers. Thank you again very much for you contribution ... sorry.
Best regards,
Michael
Hi,
maybe i'm just blindstruck or plain stupid but when i accidentally hit the
"hide" entry in the qjackctl popup menu [usually happens when i want to
reset the xrun count], there's no obvious way to make it visible again.
I figure this hiding is some "kde thing", right? Bummer, when one doesn't
run kde. Is there any other way? If not would it make sense to place the
"hide" entry at some other spot in the popup menu? The topmost is the one
which gets hit accidentally the most i figure (at least i hit it pretty
often).
flo
Hi all,
As some of you may already know, I am going to present a paper/demo at the
upcoming ICMC 2004 conference in Miami on Linux titled:
Linux as a Mature Digital Audio Workstation in Academic Electroacoustic
Studios – Is Linux Ready for Prime Time?
As promised I will be posting an expanded version of the paper online right
after the presentation that is slated for the Wednesday next week.
I would like to use this opportunity to thank all the members of this
wonderful community for their insight and help in making my final paper as
accurate and objective as possible. Furthermore, I would like to thank
everyone involved in the development of audio software for the GNU/Linux
platform because without you none of this would've been possible.
Finally, just a couple days ago I was invited to serve as one of the panel
members on Matthew Wright's discussion titled "Standards From the Computer
Music Community" that will take place on Saturday November, 6. He wants me
to present the Linux audio community's angle on standards and considering
that this conference encompasses faculty as well as researchers and
programmers from all across the World, I feel that this is a perfect
opportunity to voice out our angle on the given topic and perhaps that way
further expose the strengths that Linux can offer.
I would like to share with you a short overview of my thoughts on this issue
and would like to encourage those of you who may have additional thoughts to
please send me your suggestions and/or corrections. Your help in this matter
is most appreciated! However, please bear in mind due to fact that I am
leaving for the conference on Sunday afternoon and am not sure how regularly
(if at all) will I be able to check my e-mail while away from home, I would
really appreciate it if you would please send me your responses before
Sunday 2pm or so. I would of course appreciate also belated comments just in
the case I do get to check my e-mail, I just cannot guarantee I'll get to
read them prior to the presentation. My sincere apologies for the unusually
short window of opportunity.
At any rate, here's my blurb:
----------------------------------------
My initial presentation will be limited to 5-7 minutes since panel will
consist of a number of members. Following everyone's initial presentation,
there will be a discussion driven in part by the questions from the
audience.
LINUX AS A STANDARD
I feel that considering linux as a standard is on one hand a kind of a
paradox as it is built on the premise that individual truly can tweak it to
heart's content and therefore it is relatively unlikely that any two Linux
boxes would look and/or perform the same. Yet, on the flip-side of the coin
Linux stands as a most successful offspring of the GNU movement and as such
it is the most revolutionary and therefore the standard-setting OS in a
category where it has no competition. Furthermore, this diversity it offers
perhaps stands in its own light as a kind of a standard offering the
end-user to shape their computer as a personalized instrument.
PLANET CCRMA/DeMuDi/THAC'S RPMS/AUDIOSLACK
The diversity seemingly suggests lack of standards, yet the software
packages in most cases seamlessly compile on various distributions. This
diversity is simply a byproduct of the diversity of the commercial Linux
distributions. This is where lies perhaps the biggest problem with Linux,
and that is the issue of different file tree across the different
distributions which introduces hurdles for the "compile-from-the-source"
crowd and in part feeds the demand for the prebuilt distros and subsequent
fragmentation (a vicious circle if you like).
KERNELS
There is no "standard" audio kernel even though some of the kernel releases
in conjunction with patches yield better performance. This diversity is
however irrelevant as most of the applications work just fine on different
sub-versions of the same kernel without a recompile. Therefore such
disparity is more of a nuisance for the end-user than a potential
standard-breaking anomaly. Furthermore the fix for such disparity is
provided via aforementioned distributions.
APPLICATIONS
The powerful thing about Linux is that while everyone is welcome to
contribute their own ideas or even design their own applications from
ground-up, the strongest concepts rather than most developed applications
are the ones who set the standard (i.e. JACK, ALSA, etc.) which is not
always the case with the commercial proprietary World where often PR plays a
critical role (i.e. VHS vs. BETAMAX -- although this is not the best example
as this is not software-related but you get my point). Eventually, the
strongest concepts do become also the most developed ones, but due to the
fact that the source is readily available and that other developers choose
to implement and therefore support those interfaces which look most
promising, should there ever a new standard arise it will always have the
chance to rise and overcome the leading standard, no matter how well the
leading standard is established, and will likely do so in a least painful
fashion for the end-user (i.e. ALSA vs. OSS as opposed to OS9 vs. OSX
transition). Finally, open-source nature of the software minimizes the
potential for misrepresentation of the format's features (a.k.a. false
advertising in the commercial world). This is where Linux truly shines.
That being said, Linux has its own share of disparate formats which impede
the development of a standard (i.e. every sequencing software has a
different format for saving the sessions). However, it is my feeling that
this is simply a transitional phase and in due time the strongest will
prevail.
As far as the standard or core applications of the Linux community are
concerned, I really do not wish to go there as that may spawn heated
discussion which may completely detract from my goals. Besides, it is
exactly this individualized preference that drives the diversity in Linux's
software offering.
AUDIO-RELATED STANDARDS THAT CAME FROM LINUX COMMUNITY (in no particular
order -- it's 3am, give me a break ;-)
Jack, LADSPA, LASH, ALSA, Ogg/Vorbis, others?
(Lash is especially interesting as it is designed to unite seemingly
different standards under one umbrella session controlling mechanism which
is something unique for the Linux platform -- other proprietary formats are
imho harder to unite under such a meta-standard, if you like, because they
are often conceived to work just by themselves and do not necessarily
encourage efforts from various competitive companies to conform to them;
they rather come up with their own standard unless the existing standard is
too strong to compete with which in either case results in a less adequate
solution for the end-user)
What is both interesting and in part detrimental (at least in short-term) to
the Linux audio community is that many formats due to their openness are not
readily supported by the proprietary world as they have no profit-making
value (i.e. Apple's DRM-ed AAC is safeguarded by Apple so that they can
profit from licensing it to other companies and/or locking in their
iTunes/iPod market).
One final remark on Linux standards as a whole is that Linux holds an upper
hand when it comes to longevity of their standards as they are not
encumbered by the IP limitations imposed by a particular company and
therefore directly dependant on the company's longevity.
----------------------------------------
Sorry for the messy spill of thoughts, hopefully you'll get the main points
of my ideas. I am just too tired at this point to try to clean-up my prose.
I would really appreciate your thoughts as well as any potential additions
you may have. Many thanks!
Best wishes,
Ivica Ico Bukvic, composer & multimedia sculptor
http://meowing.ccm.uc.edu/~ico/
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.784 / Virus Database: 530 - Release Date: 10/27/2004
Hi All! I am new to this mailing list. I was making sound for two years,
then i stopped. Now I am thinking of return, but want to try the *nix
platform instead. In near future, im thinking of buying new computer, so
then i'll install some distro of linux. For now i was just wondering if i
can hear anyone's work on linux audio apps (mp3 pref.) demonstrating the
potential of linux.
thanks in advance
ping
Thanks a lot for the help Paul!
One more quick question though, has the issue with jackd + alsa + hdsp ever been fixed where jackd only allows 2 periods and no other number?
Best wishes,
Ico
>Hence, I've been wondering what do I need to do to automate hdsploader as soon
> as the cardbus has been connected?
using the new modprobe.conf syntax ....
install snd-hdsp /sbin/modprobe --first-time --ignore-install snd-hdsp && { /usr/bin/hdsploader; }
I had to rebuild my system a couple of weeks ago, and I'm having some
trouble with sound. What I want to have work is my SBLive sound card
under alsa.
I did the install from a knoppix disk, and I boot it with the alsa
option. I can play sounds using timidity, aplay, and realaudio (at least),
and record using audacity. kmix seems to work correctly.
However, when I try to run most of the mixers, I get error messages,
and therefore I can't use sound apps that expect to be able to run a
mixer.
I seem to get all the same errors whether I'm root or a user, so I
think the permissions are set up correctly.
Here are some sample error messages:
#pydance
pygame.error: mixer system not initialized
#pysol
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/games/pysol/pysolaudio.py", line 229, in startServer
self.audiodev.init()
error: unable to open audio: No available audio device
PySol: could not connect to pysolsoundserver, sound disabled.
root@tuba:/etc/init.d# ./alsa restart
Storing ALSA mixer settings...failed.
Starting ALSA..../alsa: Error: alsactl restore failed with message 'alsactl: load_state:1134: No soundcards found...'.
done.
root@tuba:/etc/init.d#
[~]# alsamixer
alsamixer: function snd_ctl_open failed for default: No such device
[~]#
[~]# amixer
amixer: Mixer attach default error: No such device
Does anyone have any idea what could be wrong? I've done a lot of
googling, and these error messages aren't uncommon, but none of the
suggested solutions seems to work for me.
--
Laura (mailto:lconrad@laymusic.org , http://www.laymusic.org/ )
(617) 661-8097 fax: (501) 641-5011
233 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02139
> > I built and installed the lsm kernel ontop of T3, but on boot
> > I get
> > Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)
>
> This error cannot possibly be caused by the realtime LSM patch.
> Are you sure the config matches your running config otherwise?
Here is my diff
config
3,4c3,4
< # Linux kernel version: 2.6.9-rc3-mm3-VP-T3
< # Sat Oct 23 21:30:53 2004
---
> # Linux kernel version: 2.6.9-rc3-mm3-VP-T3-lsm
> # Sat Oct 30 19:54:32 2004
2082c2082
< CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=y
---
> # CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES is not set
2084a2085
> CONFIG_SECURITY_REALTIME=y
I patched the source by hand, as patch using the diff Lee provided at
http://lkml.org/lkml/diff/2004/10/8/243/1
complains of an incomplete patch
Could the disks filesystem have some security setting that the
kernel does not now have, post-patch?
e.g. SECURITY_REALTIME=1 in include/linux/sysctl.h?
Only a guess...
Thanks for the help! I hope this enables my jackd to run in
realtime without weird errors.
-thewade
On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 01:05,
> From: David Baron <d_baron(a)012.net.il>
> A long time bug in recent kernels: Mixer settings have not been saved/restored
> and everything comes up very silent.
Just checking: you rememberd to do chkconfig alsasound after installning
alsa? I had this very same problem after installing planet ccrma on my
FC1 until I found out I had skipped the chkconfig part of the install.
Timo