Greetings:
The Linux soundapps site is now mirrored in Europe at the following URL :
http://linuxsound.atnet.at
Please update your bookmarks. The www.linuxsound.at URL is no longer
in use.
The hosting site contacted me regarding the outdated material that was
still displayed, and I have brought the site into sync with the US and
Japanese mirrors. This time for sure...
Best regards,
Dave Phillips
> Anahata wrote:
> But what about effects such as stochastic resonance?
> Add a (miniscule) amount of distortion and we hear
> more of the music.
> This seems to suggest the possibility of the
recording of
> an acoustic
> performance of music sounding "better" than being
present at the performance itself.
> I see thin ice here!
Not what I'm saying really. "Better" would imply a
euphonic aspect and I'm just talking about the
information content. There's also no reason why the
low-level noise could not be added to a performance
e.g. by the rustling of clothing ;-)
I'm not an expert on this stuff but it's been proven
that stochastic resonance does increase the
information content of non-linear systems (Google for
it, there's lots of material). One question that does
arise, however, is if this added information falls
below the noise floor of the reproduction system in
use.
Greg
___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - sooooo many all-new ways to express yourself http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Dear list,
i am looking for a command line tool to calculate the BPM of a WAV- or
oggVorbis-file. So far I haven't found CLI tools, only GUI tools...
maybe someone can help me?
Chris
accompaniment
X-BeenThere: linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3
Precedence: list
Reply-To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu>
List-Id: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user.music.columbia.edu>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user>,
<mailto:linux-audio-user-request@music.columbia.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://music.columbia.edu/pipermail/linux-audio-user>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audio-user@music.columbia.edu>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audio-user-request@music.columbia.edu?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user>,
<mailto:linux-audio-user-request@music.columbia.edu?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 06:53:31 -0000
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 02:22, linux-audio-user-request(a)music.columbia.edu
wrote:
> I need a program that lets me type in chords, select a style, hit play
> and get a midifile with drum and bass accompaniment for practicing. I
> looked around and although I found a few tools they all seem to be aimed
> at jazz (which I also play, so I'll look into the ones I found), but for
> this purpose I need something in faily straight-ahead pop/rock style. Is
> such a thing outthere? Or should I go for another more jazz oriented
> tool, and if so, which?
Alas, the one I use "Jammer" and another great tool "Onyx" are Windows only.
So is BIAB. These are all paid products, not opensource or gnu. There is
little motivation to port this stuff. Not enough customer demand outside
Windows.
I will try gmorgan if I can get it compiled but I am still stuck in Windows
for this type of work and like to remain so for the foreseeable future.
I was looking at one of the RME cards to use under Linux (Ardour, etc.)
because of its ADAT ins/outs, and since I have an ADAT machine hooked up to
my mixer.
However, since the Delta 1010LT is significantly cheaper, has lots of
Ins/Outs (albeit RCAs) and SPIDIF connections, I am now considering this
route. Can anyone give me any thoughts on it? I am far from a pro, but of
course I want something I will be able to live with for a number of years.
Thanks,
Jay
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 01:12:24 +0200, Florian Schmidt wrote
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:32:02 +0200
> Atte André Jensen <atte(a)ballbreaker.dk> wrote:
> http://gmorgan.sourceforge.net/
>
I second GMOrgan. Works as advertised, with both hardware and soft synths -
and I believe it was recently announced here that a new version was released.
It's the most Band-In-A-Box-like accompaniment softare I've found for Linux.
Rick
==
->
> and now m-audio. Here's to German audio excellence! Those cold
winters
> drive you indoors to tinker with great machines and perfect them, I
> guess. :)
I don't think M-Audio is a german company, though. And while M-Audio
makes some great products they also make some very understandard ones:
Most of their USB audio cards are very hard to get to work on Linux,
if at all, contrary to what M-Audio says on their website.<-
About M-Audio... we had been using a Delta 1010 in our studio, with some
heavy 96k usage under RH9 and basically a CCRMA setup. We had two of
these cards fry and become totally unusable - they had a terrible
high-pitched hum and pretty much no audio output. The service on the
cards was pretty bad, too. We had to ditch M-Audio and go with RME
(Multiface) for the rest of the semester.
Matt
Hi
I released gmorgan-0.23. This release is a bugfix version and solve
compilation problems.
Changes in v0.23
-------------------------
Fixed compilation problems with locales.
Fixed bug selecting Drums Instrument and Control type.
Fixed bug when display Sound Names.
Fixed range of Modulation Control.
Fixed bug in song sequencer finish point.
Small things are also added.
Available in: http://gmorgan.sf.net
Thanks
Josep
Hello, everyone -- Newbie alert!
I don't have any sort of external MIDI equipment.
Just as the subj. line indicates, a fairly ordinary PC
setup, a few years out of date (Celeron 400MHz, 128 MB
RAM, ATI Rage 128 card and SoundBlaster 16 PCI card).
With this setup, all I can figure out how to do so far
is to use timidity to play MIDI files. I can use
Rosegarden to export my "scores" to a MIDI file, but I
don't know how set up a virtual sequencer, or what
/dev file to specify in Rosegarden's sequencer
configuration. When I try to put in /dev/midi, *midi0,
*sequencer, *audio, *dsp, *whatever, it tells me "no
such device" or unable to access or something.
But this is not just a Rosegarden question -- will I
be able to use any synthesizers or sequencers without
a "real" device to specify? Would the solution
involve symlinks, or named pipes, or other things I've
never yet explored?
Thanks for any tips,
Mark
=====
--
Seek professional help! Ask a librarian.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
I have my new Audigy Platinum Pro working for wave audio (ogg, mp3,
etc). But MIDI just won't play. Here's what I tried and I thought it
should work.
drew@linux:~> pmidi -list
Port Client name Port name
64:0 Audigy MPU-401 (UART) - Rawmid Audigy MPU-401 (UART)
64:32 Audigy MPU-401 (UART) - Rawmid Audigy MPU-401 #2
65:0 Emu10k1 WaveTable Emu10k1 Port 0
65:1 Emu10k1 WaveTable Emu10k1 Port 1
65:2 Emu10k1 WaveTable Emu10k1 Port 2
65:3 Emu10k1 WaveTable Emu10k1 Port 3
drew@linux:~> pmidi -p 65:0 LetItBe.mid
But it hangs right here. It looks like it might even be trying to play
something. But nothing comes out. No matter which port I try, nothing
comes out. And, yes the volume is up. On everything! But I get
absolutely no midi sound.
It seems to me that this is the simplest MIDI test I can do. Nothing
else is running. Shouldn't this be making some sound?
Thanks,
Drew