Hi again,
I'm considering getting a good professional quality soundcard.
Anybody want to plug their favourites? I've been watching e-bay
and there are always M-Audio Delta 44's and Delta 66's available.
Any other good cards out there to keep my eyes open for?
Also, I'd like to use the spdif I/O on the card I have, to reduce
the computer noise on the audio inputs, but all of the outputs on
my outboard gear are analog. Can inexpensive audio to spdif
adaptors be found? I've been searching, but have come up with zip
so far.
Okay, thanks again in advance.
~Jos~
Hi
I released this small utility ... and sorry for the English :-)
Overview
---------------
mcontrol is a ALSA MIDI sequencer client and brings the possibility to
assign up to twelve "simultaneous" MIDI control messages for each controller
in your MIDI keyboard (Modulation Wheel, Breath Controller, Foot Controller,
Pitch Bend and After Touch).
An example is always better:
You can send Reverb, Volume, Chorus, Modulation MIDI messages using the
modulation wheel controller of your MIDI keyboard. Or pitch bend and reverb
using after-touch, or control the Filter Cutoff in modulator wheel, or
control the Pan using the Pitch Bender ..... etc etc etc ...
Most of the moderns synthesizers can do that, but normally don't send the
midi data, with mcontrol you can record series of controllers in your
favorite sequencer.
Up to 200 Midi message controllers, can be edited and saved.
And programs and Banks of 45 programs of what you edit can be saved too.
availabel in:
http://personal.telefonica.terra.es/web/soudfontcombi/mcontrol-0.0.01.tar.gz
Please check, sure they will be tones of bugs :-)
Requirements:
---------------------
* Linux (Tested on a PIII 933 Debian sid and PII 300 Gentoo).
* ALSA (with sequencer).
* FLTK (tested and compiled with v1.1.1)
* Midi Keyboard (optional)
Josep
I am trying to get RTSynth to work. The audio output is apparently not
getting connected to alsa properly. When I hit the on button, I get the
following error message:
Sample format not available for playback: Invalid argument
Alsa is running fine, just this app complaining. Any ideas ?
Thanks
AC
Hello List
Not really what we're for, but - in transcribing my vinly I've found one
with a blob of candle wax on it (covers about a 1/4" diameter)
What's the best way to remove this?
Cheers
Dylan
--
"I see your Schwartz is as big as mine"
-Dark Helmet
Anyone knows an application (for Linux) that can take the sound of a
single instrument (or voice, or anything that's simple - not complex
sounds) as an input, and transform it into notes (or a MIDI file)?
Essentially, it's what a musician with perfect pitch does - upon hearing
a melody, start playing it on an instrument.
Or, if you wish, the reverse of a softsynth: from WAV to MIDI.
I'm pretty sure i've seen something like that advertised somewhere
("Sound On Sound"? "Keyboard Magazine"?), and i'm pretty sure it's not
for Linux, so i wonder if there's something similar on Linux.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
>From: R Parker <rtp405(a)yahoo.com>
>
>> Tip 3: Group the samples so that all samples from
>> one drum kit
>> are together.
>
>Organization is mandatory. Nothing worse than trying
>to find what you want:
I did mean that I don't accidentally take snare from another
set and tom from another set, different sets being recorded
and mastered differently.
>Right, with an expception being the stereo snare drums
>where the whole point is to design sounds.
But provide the raw snare sounds as well. Prereverberated
snares sounds great at first but then they are unusable in
general. It depends on what type of music one does. Not
everyone makes disco.
>If you can't hear anything then all useful audio is
>gone. I've been allowing the tail to fade completely
Or computer fans are too noisy. Or zooming vertically to waveform
display is annoying.
>In my tests, I trimmed heads to be tight. I can't
>think of any situation where there's a benefit to
>leaving space in front of the sample.
There is no much space in the front of hit, but I have seen
samples where the cut is too much. An extra fast artificial
slope makes the sound kick, but it is unnatural.
Extra space at the start does not make harm. Software can set
the zero position deep in to the audiofile if one wishes.
>A second version of the library could be for surround
>where anything is open for debate. Incidentally, I
The major motto in my sound library project is that
the raw samples are most important because everything else
can be done later -- better than you and me can do.
(So, I'm happy as long as I get the raw unprocessed recordings.)
Making this a lot of pre-effected samples is an old-fashioned
way. Now one should provide only raw samples and a software
for making effected and spatialized sounds. Say, I could have
a footstep sound and use software to make a person to walk
in the room. Current sound libraries have sound such as
"walking from left to right" --- quite boring actually.
>What reverb instruments do you have?
>I've got Lexicon LXP-15, TC Works and Waves.
I have written my own. I thought to try something which those
reverbs don't provide.
Juhana
Heyall,
Steve Harris <S.W.Harris(a)ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> Wow. I wasn't actually aware that there are people who prefer forums
> (really). The key thing to me for mailing lists is that you dont have to
> think about which bits you last read, they just turn up, in a mail folder,
> and you dont accidentally miss an interesting discussion because you
> forgot to check the forum website for a week.
> My memory is not good enough to remmeber what forum threads and messages I
> have read otherwise. Also the time take to compose a typical forum message
> is massivly higher than replying to a list - though that way be a point in
> forum's favour ;)
The email notification function on the forums I'm suscribed to supersedes my
erasable memory: each time the thread I've been posting to gets an update, I
receive a link that leads me directly to the first unseen message, with the
previous just above!
I must admit the only use I find in the mailing-lists' batched daily digests is
having a look at the threads having been refreshed: I can't then do anything
else but browsing the archive, unless it's more like a crowd cross-talking
upside-down!
Some other arguments in favour of forums?
- sorted by folders... while here all hardware, installation or general issues
are muddled up.
- no need to lose archival space with infinite quotations, but still the abilty
to quote short sections when needed!
- advanced writing capabilities: not that I'd hate ASCII art, but using
underlined or bold words, ordered (or not) lists, enhances the ideas exchange,
so that the reader can oversee faster the issue. (But lose those ugly emoticons
please! ,-)
- less dependent of the user's client: it seems that each time someone here has
a signature beginning with 2 dashes "--" followed by a carriage return, my email
client (online ISP built-in Horde IMP) can't understand it correctly and
"shadows" all the following messages! (Plain text, not HTML-enabled) And this
client definitely cannot respect the thread tree... When it comes to forums,
Once php is supported, browsers won't groan!
- rewritable media: writing long messages (like now) compells me to use a
notepad to avoid failure whenever the email session expires. (I don't like using
hard-drive installed email clients due to the many times I'm not at home.) On
forums, I can store the message temporarly by previewing it, without rushing on
the keyboard; and correct my mistakes after the first "official draft".
- browsing a user's profile to find all the threads he's created or fed, when
you know you're usually reflecting yourself on his words.
Enough said...
What's the best of both worlds then?
Cheers
Christian Frisson (the one for mailing-lists) aka Mr°Freeze (staying anonymously
cloaked on forums)
> > Hello all, I asked Sound on Sound magazine to provide a Linux
> > forum on their site (in addition to Windows, Mac, Atari etc)
> > and they have done this today. You can see the link at:
> >
> > http://sound-on-sound2.infopop.net/2/OpenTopic
> >
> > The forums are quite heavily used, and you don't need to
> > subscribe to the magazine to post messages.
>
> I can't really use web forums - I already find difficult enough to
> handle e-mail!
I do know what you mean, but it seems to me that the mainstream
computer musician with a Mac or PC tends to use web forums as well
as, or instead of, mailing lists.
Maybe this is because most of these people only started using the
internet after the browser was invented, who knows?
Cheers
Daniel
Hello,
I have just intalled Fedora Core II,
and was trying to use apt-get to install
ardour from Planet CCRMA. Some of the
packages will not insall, complaining about
missing keys. Anybody know what is happening
here?
Thanks,
Tobiah
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
liblrdf (0.3.7-1.rhfc1.ccrma)
libsamplerate (0.1.0-2.rhfc1.ccrma)
libsndfile (1.0.9-1.rhfc1.ccrma)
raptor (1.0.0-1.rhfc1.ccrma)
The following NEW packages will be installed:
ardour (0.9beta11.2-1.rhfc1.ccrma)
liblrdf (0.3.7-1.rhfc1.ccrma)
libsamplerate (0.1.0-2.rhfc1.ccrma)
libsndfile (1.0.9-1.rhfc1.ccrma)
raptor (1.0.0-1.rhfc1.ccrma)
0 upgraded, 5 newly installed, 0 removed and 12 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/4687kB of archives.
After unpacking 13.2MB of additional disk space will be used.
Checking GPG signatures...Y/n]
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/raptor_1.0.0-1.rhfc1.ccrma_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/liblrdf_0.3.7-1.rhfc1.ccrma_i386.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5
(GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#68d9802a)
Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/libsndfile_1.0.9-1.rhfc1.ccrma_i386.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1
md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#68d9802a)
Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/libsamplerate_0.1.0-2.rhfc1.ccrma_i386.rpm: (SHA1) DSA
sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#68d9802a)
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/ardour_0.9beta11.2-1.rhfc1.ccrma_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
E: Error(s) while checking package signatures:
2 unsigned package(s)
3 package(s) with unknown signatures
0 package(s) with illegal/corrupted signatures
Hey nando - this is Aaron Trumm - I'd be back channeling you right now but i don't have my address book - I'm in Berkeley right now, will be in bay area til tuesday - trying to get ahold of chris or you or SOMEBODY because i want to visit - i'm at aaron(a)nquit.com - shout at me! :)
sorry, list, for the public backchannel attempt...
-------
NQuit
www.nquit.com
-------
----- Original Message -----
From: Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
Sent: 11/30/1999
To: linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Planet CCRMA and apt-get
> On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 10:29, toby(a)tobiah.org wrote:
> > I have just intalled Fedora Core II,
> > and was trying to use apt-get to install
> > ardour from Planet CCRMA.
>
> But you are still using the FC1 urls in /etc/apt/sources.list. Please
> change all references to the version number from /1/ to /2/. BTW, I
> don't yet recommend FC2 as a good option for low latency audio.
>
> > Some of the
> > packages will not insall, complaining about
> > missing keys. Anybody know what is happening
> > here?
>
> Your version of apt refuses to install packages without a key, or with
> unknown keys (it is probably apt coming from fedora.us). The gpg key for
> the Planet CCRMA repository is here:
>
> http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/apt/configuration/all/RPM-GPG-KEY.pla…
>
> Download it and rpm --import it.
>
> FC2 packages are signed, not all packages in previous versions are
> signed (as you found out).
>
> -- Fernando
>
> > Reading Package Lists... Done
> > Building Dependency Tree... Done
> > The following extra packages will be installed:
> > liblrdf (0.3.7-1.rhfc1.ccrma)
> > libsamplerate (0.1.0-2.rhfc1.ccrma)
> > libsndfile (1.0.9-1.rhfc1.ccrma)
> > raptor (1.0.0-1.rhfc1.ccrma)
> > The following NEW packages will be installed:
> > ardour (0.9beta11.2-1.rhfc1.ccrma)
> > liblrdf (0.3.7-1.rhfc1.ccrma)
> > libsamplerate (0.1.0-2.rhfc1.ccrma)
> > libsndfile (1.0.9-1.rhfc1.ccrma)
> > raptor (1.0.0-1.rhfc1.ccrma)
> > 0 upgraded, 5 newly installed, 0 removed and 12 not upgraded.
> > Need to get 0B/4687kB of archives.
> > After unpacking 13.2MB of additional disk space will be used.
> > Checking GPG signatures...Y/n]
> > Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/raptor_1.0.0-1.rhfc1.ccrma_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
> > Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/liblrdf_0.3.7-1.rhfc1.ccrma_i386.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5
> > (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#68d9802a)
> > Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/libsndfile_1.0.9-1.rhfc1.ccrma_i386.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1
> > md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#68d9802a)
> > Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/libsamplerate_0.1.0-2.rhfc1.ccrma_i386.rpm: (SHA1) DSA
> > sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#68d9802a)
> > Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/ardour_0.9beta11.2-1.rhfc1.ccrma_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
> > E: Error(s) while checking package signatures:
> > 2 unsigned package(s)
> > 3 package(s) with unknown signatures
> > 0 package(s) with illegal/corrupted signatures
>