>The main problem I'm having with your
>postings is that they are so incredibly verbose and take an awful lot of
>reading. . . . .
Yes - this has been brought to my attention. ;)
I see that most here do generally keep it to '6 lines or less', and
recognize that on a list - especially such a busy one - this is good
etiquette and a practical necessity.
I have trouble with the terseness, but will definitely work on it - or just
refrain from posting if I can't say what I want to in a succinct fashion.
>> [Sorry for the rant, but that definitely pushed one of my buttons.]
>
>Ooh! what does this big shiny red one do? *prod prod*
You don't wan't to know. ;)
>This list does run at quite a high technical level, when I first signed
>up I thought I'd got LAD by mistake.
Definitely had the same reaction - sometimes I can't tell whether I'm
reading from LAD or LAU, which is why I thought the forum was a good idea -
though I agree it would be a shame to split up the community.
But you must realize that there are many of us interested in using Linux
for music production, (and more generally in the oss community) who are
*not* programmers or engineers.
The level of code-speak/tech-speak feels very high for a 'user' list, and I
do think this community can be off-putting to a lot of people with
less-technical backgrounds.
There doesn't seem to be a place for more casual, less technically-focused
discussion - and doubtless that's precisely as intended.
Perhaps I can create a forum at linuxaudyssey which can serve as an LAU
refugee camp where discussions of a more general nature can take place
(even discussions about the spiritual aspects of music :) ) - kind of like
a pub you go to after work - "A place where OT is always On-Topic" :D
>If you hang out here for a bit longer, I think you'll start to really
>appreciate the level of support this list can give.
I already do.
I respect the hell out of you guys - that's why I've hung with it so long
trying to pick your brains and glean what I can comprehend from your
erudite discussions. :)
And thanks for yet another cruelty-free post. :)
I'll turn this into a cruelty-free list yet!
- Maluvia
Greetings:
I retrieved the sources for the Linux kernel 2.6.15 (Debian's, not a
Demudi kernel) and successfully built it. However, before I install it I
need to know a few things.
First, is the kernel itself enough for low-latency performance ? I
opted for the PREEMPT config, along with the 1000 MHz resolution for the
timer, and I've compiled the RTC into the kernel. So do I now need a PAM
or lsm or what ? It's been a long while since I configured and compiled
a kernel, lots of choices exist that weren't there the last time I
looked. I'm not even sure I know what PAM and lsm do. Btw, if I do need
more than the kernel sources please include URLs for the needed stuff.
Second, do I need to compile anything other than ALSA for audio/MIDI
USB support ?
Finally, the build instructions still assume LILO. What considerations
need to be made for using GRUB instead ?
Any other advice/suggestions regarding this kernel will be greatly
appreciated. :)
Best,
dp
-> nitpicking: don't think 'franca' stands for french, see
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lingua_franca (I'm not 100% sure whether
>you were implying franca stands for french or simply that franch was
>lingua franca once)
Actually, I did mean both, as I knew the franca part had something to do
with the Franks which had to do with Gaul which includes much of modern-day
France. I actually thought that's where the term came from.
Merci beaucoup - I stand corrected.
(Self-esteem about bottomed-out for the day.) :)
- M
>English is such a widespread language only because we Americans are to
>stupid or lazy(Or Both) to learn other languages so we force other
>countries to speak ours;)
Well said - and what a pity.
(Doubtless why so many Americans are up in arms about becoming a bilingual
country.)
I have enough trouble trying to follow the technical jargon here - I can't
even imagine trying to follow it in another language.
Hat's off to all our non-'English' friends who do this every day.
(I feel very dumb. :( )
- Maluvia
Hi
Linux + DVD : "Studio d'enregistrement professionnel sous Linux"
- Ardour (9 pages)
- Interview :G. Laurent/Rosegarden
- MusicPD,
- Dynebolic
- Mediainlinux 4-RC5
http://www.lpmagazine.org/fr/modules/news/
:)
found in France :)
>does anyone know of instances of big computing power going into making
>music? Any recordings? Just one of those questions rolling around
>the head.
Don't they do this on the soundtracks for many big-budget film productions?
I remember a fascinating special feature about how they did the sound
effects on one of those animated films (I think it was 'Road to ElDorado')
I believe they use a number of clusters and what not - and I'll bet you
anything at least some of them are running Linux.
-M
Hi!
Simply put, LinuxMAO.org (standing for "Linux Computer-aided Music") is a
french-speaking Wiki for worldwide linux-audio-users:
http://www.linuxmao.org/
In a rather humble than chauvinistic initiative, let's say it's a common wisdom
french people do not speak english that fluently... ,-)
Contributers are welcome!
Christian
Walking. The grid is walking. Or as a friend put it: "An apple rolls
around the grand piano keys."
"Grand Walker"
Total data length: 14,910,301 bytes
Playback length: 21m:08.536s
Average bitrate: 94.031524 kbps
http://footils.org/cms/show/49
(techinfo: Pd, Gem, fluid~, NS_piano.sf2)
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
http://www.emvg.net/iamallright.mp3
Personally I am happy with this song, although there are some things
(cowbell, compression) in the final mix that I should work out. Or then
not.
I used these things to make it:
- Mandriva Linux 2006, 1200 mhz AMD Duron, 512 mb RAM, Audigy2
- Ardour (with some VST & Ladspa plugins), Hydrogen
- Katar Jazzblaster -bass guitar
- Katar Popmaster - el. guitar
- Maya -banjo
- Yamaha PSR-273 keyboard
- Behringer Tube Ultragain Mic200 preamp
- Behringer Eurorack MX 602A -mixer
- some BeyerDynamic -microphone