Greetings,
Thank you for all your great feedback on the last two betas!
phasex-0.12.0-beta4 addresses all of the concerns brought up so far:
Velocity: Many of you have noticed that velocity and aftertouch
were completely unsupported. Now, velocity (with aftertouch) can be
mapped to directly to oscillators and LFOs (by setting the source),
used as a modulation source (adjust volume w/ AM or pitch w/ FM), or
mapped to the filter in the filter-lfo section.
GUI: Some of you mentioned that the colors were too dark with too
little contrast, so now there are four GTK theme options: Dark
(original purple background), Light (orange background), System (use
the system GTK theme), and Custom (choose any gtkrc file for your
theme). There have also been issues with getting phasex to fit on
small screens (usually netbooks). The knob images have been trimmed
down vertically (just blank pixels), and the padding between widgets
has been almost completely cut out. The font can be selected in the
preferences. Additionally, a true fullscreen mode has been added.
It is now possible to fit phasex into an 800x600 desktop.
Atom processors: Compiler optimization flags for the Intel Atom
processors have been added to the build system. Run './configure
--enable-arch=atom' to build for the Atom. To force 32- or 64-bit
builds, use 'atom32' or 'atom64'.
The rest is just small tweaks and bugfixes, such as fixing the
segfault on quit issue, fixing all the compiler warnings, minor
updates to the build system, new menu items, etc.
As I don't have access to a netbook right now, please let me know
how it works out with the Atom or other low-power CPU, or on any
machine with a screen smaller than 1024x768. Of course, feedback
from the rest of you is highly welcome, too ;-}
Visit http://sysex.net/phasex/beta for source tarball, Fedora 11
RPMS, or Fedora 8 RPMS.
Cheers,
--ww
OK, I am officially intrigued :-) My focus is live; I do recording
sometimes on laptops and then immediately copy it elsewhere, but my
primary is a desktop box set up for transportability with two laptop
hard drives, running ZynAddSubFX (Yoshimi from now on I think) and
Qsynth as MIDI module with my keyboard. I have a third desktop hard
drive installed also, not being used, as an aid to moving it all to
RAID-1 which has seemed likely. But now I understand positively that
LVM drive mirroring is an option. A few questions:
1. What are the advantages of LVM drive mirroring over RAID-1? I
understand that one advantage is mdadm update issues; I have had a
machine hosed this way too. Are there other advantages?
2. If I set up LVM drive mirroring, can I boot off either drive?
3. How do I set up LVM drive mirroring?
4. If I set up LVM drive mirroring and take a drive out, can I put that
drive in another machine and expect it to boot?
J.E.B.
Greetings,
I've posted some recordings from a performance of my band last Saturday
night. The tracks are simple unprocessed and unmastered board
recordings, made by the soundman for the gig. As such they're intended
primarily as a record of the performance, but I'd like to use some of
them for tracks on a CD to sell at gigs. Here's where I need the advice.
As you can tell, the bass is too well-recorded (it had a direct line
out). I'd like to be able to diminish its presence, but I think I need
some advice on using EQ. Also, the originals had no processing, so I
added a bit of CAPS Stereo Versatile Plate in ReZound. I'm curious to
know what others here might do. Alas, there are no
multichannel/multitrack versions, I have to work with the present stereo
mix.
You can hear the tracks here:
http://linux-sound.org/audio/Woke_Up_This_Morning.ogghttp://linux-sound.org/audio/Outside_Woman_Blues.ogghttp://linux-sound.org/audio/I_Dont_Know_Your_Name.ogg
MP3 versions are also available (s/ogg/mp3).
I'll send them through JAMin later today, so any advice re: using JAMin
would be especially helpful, but I'm interested in any & all responses.
Btw, ReZound and the encoders were the only Linux audio software used
for these tracks.
Enjoy, critique, keep breathing.
Best,
dp
Here is Fons' great auto-wah plugin, being used live:
http://www.pringlized.com/lahar/Song_3_flv.htm
This was the first time I'd played with these guys, and so I wasn't entirely 100% sure of the arrangements or body language. So I screwed up a few times in there, oops. Also, the sound guy had the keyboards really hot in the mix. But, at least you can hear auto-wah happening, big time.
Thanks, Fons!
-ken
The 'ccmake' and 'cmake' steps appear to work fine, but when I do
'make', nothing happens at all. No errors, no compilations. Anyone
know what I should try next?
J.E.B.
canadian magazine eContact! is running an issue dedicated to open source
audio software. enjoy, jörn
PRESS RELEASE -- for immediate diffusion / pour diffusion immédiate
Please forward at large.
Communauté électroacoustique canadienne
(CEC) Canadian Electroacoustic Community
eContact! 11.3
Logiciels audio « open source » / Open Source for Audio Application
[F] eContact! 11.3 s'intéresse au logiciel libre et ses applications
dans les domaines du son et de l'audio. Le numéro offre notamment un
guide d'initiation, l'Open Source Travel Guide [wiki] -- qui est
lui-même un outil libre comme son nom l'indique -- ainsi que des
articles abordant les raisons pour lesquelles les gens et les
institutions actives en électroacoustique créent et utilisent des outils
et des environnements logiciels libres.
[E] eContact! 11.3 takes a look at open source and its application in
the audio and sound world. The issue features an Open Source Travel
Guide [wiki] -- an open resource in itself -- and articles discussing
the reasons why and the ways in which people and institutions involved
in electroacoustics are using and developing open source tools and
environments.
http://cec.concordia.ca/econtact/11_3
--
Communauté électroacoustique canadienne (CEC) Canadian Electroacoustic
Community
http://econtact.ca | http://sonus.ca | http://cec.concordia.ca/jttp/2009
The Open Source Musician Podcast community has started a new project to
bring live free culture music to more listeners. The project is called
"OSMLive" and it is basically a ice-cast server that can be scheduled for
live performances. More information can be found at
http://live.pipemanmusic.com.
I would love to have more people schedule shows and help get the word out
about them. If you want to schedule something send a mail to
live(a)pipemanmusic.com
Thanks.
I am almost convinced that I want to go Linux audio in my studio. I
have a x64 3ghz dual core AMD based box that is my dedicated DAW. I am
now deciding which distro to use that will give me stable performance
with minimum effort.
64 Studio would seem like an obvious choice but because I would like
to have VST's available, I seem to recall that is a possible issue?
Beyond that, is there any other advantage(s) to using a x64 OS other
than RAM access beyond 4gb? Is there any 32 bit OS performance
degradation when installed on a x64 machine?
Thanks,
Russell