Hello everyone!
I had a USB audio device here, a Zoom h4n, portable recorder/audio
interface. When I connect it to my box, it shows up and ALSA finds it.
First: ALSA can't open the mixer, no elemtns found, alsamixer says.
Second: I can't use JACK with it, although I read on some forum, that a chap
managed with Fedora FC6. JACK tells me something about broken pipe. It runs,
but there's no sound and I definitely have to "killall -9" it. :-( I tried
JACK with different period sizes (-p) and different frames per period (-n),
different samplerates, although I can set these on the Zoom, before I connect
it. As I said: ALSA can record from it and play sounds using it.
Does anyone of you have an idea on the subject?
Kindest regards
Julien
--------
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
the Linux TextBased Studio guide
======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
http://www.juliencoder.de
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ludwig Maes <ludwig.maes(a)gmail.com>
Date: 2009/6/26
Subject: Laptop speakers nonfunctional, jacks functional
To: alsa-user(a)lists.sourceforge.net
Realtek ALC888S (according to preinstalled Realtek HD audio manager on
windows) visible jacks working, builtin laptop speakers and subwoofer
silent.
Running Ubuntu 9.04 compiled and installed alsa 1.0.20.
http://www.alsa-project.org/db/?f=fb64ba9a8ab28d8c16532ece21e3adba7219e4b9
Notice it thinks it is ALC1200. I searched this and found it in
patch_realtek.c, I changed the equality test so we would end up in ALC888
section... result was I got an extra volume control on mixer for BEEP.
previously did not hear beeps when hitting down in terminal. BEEP is in
headphones or line out. still not on speakers. aplay -l listed ALC888 too
but codec#0 still showed ALC1200... I dont know the flow of information
changes in ALSA to change this codec... I undid the equality test change and
now its back to original realtek patch, recompiled reinstalled...
added model=generic, to asound.state, this gave me more controls IIRC..
downloaded codecgraph utility, result:
http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/8692/codec0.png
I dont know how these codecgraphs work, but 4 jacks are right! the internal
speakers appear twice?? how can one rewire these, or enable assuming dotted
is disabled, does every amplifier triangle correspond to a volume control?
is there a direct way to make changes?
dmesg |grep hda:
[ 16.172695] hda_codec: Unknown model for ALC883, trying auto-probe from
BIOS...
[ 18.037866] ALSA
/usr/src/alsa/alsa-driver-1.0.20/pci/hda/../../alsa-kernel/pci/hda/hda_intel.c:636:
hda_intel: azx_get_response timeout, switching to polling mode: last
cmd=0x00bb0000
Realtek datasheet for ALC888S, reference design, if helpful:
http://www.realtek.com.tw/products/productsView.aspx?Langid=1&PFid=28&Level…
I am very willing to test proposals...
friendly greetings,
Ludwig
> I have it running here. And it works
> in douplex mode, but you cant switch off the direct
> monitoring, which is quite a pity. But i can confirm that
> there is no mixer availible.
>
> I cant tell what did it, but it worked fine from the
> beginning. I have build alsa from source and loaded firmware
> for the tascam usxy cards. Might be quite the same
> procedure, i assume.
>
> Bon chance,
>
> Bjoern
>
>
> >
> > > Hello everyone!
> > > I had a USB audio device here, a Zoom
> > h4n, portable recorder/audio
> > > interface. When I connect it to my box, it shows
> up
> > and ALSA finds it.
> > > First: ALSA can't open the mixer, no
> > elemtns found, alsamixer says.
> >
> > That's pretty normal with USB devices
> >
> > > Second: I can't use JACK with it,
> > although I read on some forum, that a chap
> > > managed with Fedora FC6. JACK tells me something
> about
> > broken pipe. It runs,
> > > but there's no sound and I definitely have to
> "killall
> > -9" it. :-( I tried
> > > JACK with different period sizes (-p) and
> different
> > frames per period (-n),
> > > different samplerates, although I can set these
> on the
> > Zoom, before I connect
> > > it. As I said: ALSA can record from it and play
> sounds
> > using it.
> > > Does anyone of you have an idea on the
> > subject?
> >
> > Have you tried to run JACK in "capture only" ("-C"
> IIRC)
> > mode?
> > If I understand correctly, that device acts only as
> input
> > device...?
> >
> > > Kindest regards
> > > Julien
> >
> > HTH
> > Ciao
> > --
> > Emiliano Grilli
> > Linux user #209089
> > http://www.emillo.net
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-audio-user mailing list
> > Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
> > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. lovely weather (Dave Phillips)
> 2. Re: lovely weather (Folderol)
> 3. Re: lovely weather (Russell Hanaghan)
> 4. Re: lovely weather (J?rn Nettingsmeier)
> 5. Re: lovely weather (Dave Phillips)
> 6. Re: lovely weather (Christoph Eckert)
> 7. Re: lovely weather (Fons Adriaensen)
> 8. Re: lovely weather (Atte Andre Jensen)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:08:52 -0400
> From: Dave Phillips <dlphillips(a)woh.rr.com>
> Subject: [LAU] lovely weather
> To: LAU <linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org>
> Message-ID: <4A3D17A4.6050603(a)woh.rr.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Greetings,
>
> In fact, we've had some terrible weather. Yesterday morning we had the
> heaviest thunderstorm of the year so far, complete with great dark
> rumbling skies and pyrotechnical displays of lightning. Lots and lots of
> lightning.
>
> Can you tell where this message is going ?
>
> I like to think I'm not utterly deranged, so as a matter of course I
> disconnect the power lines to my gear whenever we have a heavy storm.
> And so I did this time, except I didn't unplug the cable modem
> connection. Well, live and learn, and so I have, to the combined
> expense of one modem, one router, and one laptop. (Sounds kinda like a
> John Lee Hooker song). I'm actually happy the damage didn't include the
> two desktop boxes also connected to the router.
>
> I'll remember that cable connection next time, I promise.
>
> Grumble...
>
> Best,
>
> dp
>
Dave, very sorry to hear that!
Are surge protectors insufficient to protect sensitive audio equipment? We
have started to use surge protectors to connect all our electronics to
outlets, and they seem to have helped immensely. they have something like
$75,000 equipment warranties but i don't want to take chances with replacing
or repairing my audio equipment (what a hassle!) if something does happen.
on the other hand, i don't care if my tv gets fried :)
ethan
Now that I've gotten a pretty clear picture of the concensus about
PulseAudio, I wondered about some of the other (new and old) sound
facilities in Linux, and specifically wondered if being on a system like
Gentoo where one can turn off build-time support for these things is a
good idea. So...
PortAudio:
>From what I can see, this doesn't do much. It seems to provide an API
of sorts that unifies Linux sound with sound on other operating systems.
(For example, FreeBSD supports PortAudio, even though its an OSS-based
system.) Then again, I thought Alsa's OSS emulation provided a
'/dev/dsp' that did that already. Anyway...
Is this bad? Has anyone had nearly the nightmares with
PortAudio presence in a DAW system that's described from users of newer
systems with PulseAudio? I don't want to incriminate it just because
its name is similar. (Though I do find myself calling PortAudio
"PulseAudio" by accident a lot. They really could have found a better
name for that...)
Gentoo has a USE flag to disable PortAudio, but I hesitate to do
so if most of the apps these days are taking its presence as a given. I
don't want to diverge from what's perceived as "normal" upstream more
than necessary to achieve good results.
Esound ("esd"):
This is truly 90's technology that won't die, and we all know that.
The question is, how much of an assumption is it in the apps (and in the
Gnome desktop) to the extent that if it weren't there, there would be
problems? Is it safe on a Gentoo system to globally ban build support
for ESD? Sure, Alsa has its own mixer, but will the apps just
transparently use it if ESD isn't around? This is really the gist of
all my questions here: We know there are daemons we don't like. But
which ones are safe to actually kill, and which ones do we still sadly
depend on for something or other?
Arts ("artsd"):
I already have some doubts about eliminating this one, at least in any
system that hopes to have a KDE desktop available. Even if we don't
need it per se, KDE seems (at least to a naive user like me) to be
deeply wedded to it. There are even direct mentions of artsd setup in
some of the audio setup panels of the KDE Control Panel. Does banning
Artsd support equal losing all desktop audio support in KDE? It looks
like it might...experiences?
I guess what I'm thinking is that it'd be nice to do a build in which
everything but Alsa and Jack is banished to hell, but I'm wondering if
that will leave some programs at a loss to find a mixer at all, and thus
without sound. Ideally, all sound apps, regardless of what target
they're expecting, ought to be able to transparently find the Alsa
mixer, and multiplex with other apps to share access with it
simultaneously, also without special setup.
Does that work?
(I'd even put up with artsd if I had to, since KDE seems to assume it,
and since it doesn't seem to cause major problems...)
--
+ Brent A. Busby + "We've all heard that a million monkeys
+ UNIX Systems Admin + banging on a million typewriters will
+ University of Chicago + eventually reproduce the entire works of
+ Physical Sciences Div. + Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet,
+ James Franck Institute + we know this is not true." -Robert Wilensky
>i remember eno describing the hundreds or thousands of demo tapes he
>would get at one point in his career, and noting that people didn't
>seem to realize that for every piece he ever released, he worked on
>"hundreds or a thousand" other pieces that he discarded because they
>were crap. his allusion was clearly that most of what we all produce
>is crap, but that shouldn't stop anyone from engaging in the process.
>we just have to find a way to get people to understand how the
>difference between making music for others and making it for yourself.
>there is no shame in either.
So true, that part.
Writing for others is a mix of inspiration and damned hard work, and
requires a strange combination of humility (listening to others), and
enough bravado to follow your muse.
Started this time last year with 8 songs.
Cut back to 4.
Wrote another 12.
Cut back to 9.
Sent demos of 9 songs to musos/engineers whose opinions matter to me.
Cut down to 3 songs. (Which have all been re-recorded/arranged)
Recorded another 10 songs.
Keeping critiques of aforementioned friends in mind - back to 9 songs.
Wrote another 5.
Played and played and played those tracks to many people, noting what
seemed to please and what didn´t.
Down to 7 songs, in the process of writing one last piece, then call it
a day and unleash my crap on the world.
So that will be 35 odd full-recordings, many rerecordings and
rearrangements to produce 8 tracks. That of course doesn´t include all
the stuff I wrote and forgot about, or pieces that just don´t fit.
Now that doesn't mean that the other pieces are necessarily "crap" -
wrote a lovely Ben Fold's Five-style ballad for my gf - but she's the
only one that will hear that.
I believe, that after 35 years composing, 7 albums and thousands of
performances with various long-haired groups that shall go unnamed,
that only experience can really tell you if it's personal or public.
And most of what I released when young should have never been let out
of the rehearsal studio. (thus "unnamed groups")
I remember Peter Gabriel saying something similar, but I can't find the
interview in question. He was far more eloquent, though.
- shane
Hello All,
I am a newbee to LinuxAudio and am trying to get a headset microphone working.
Here is some results from testing that someone else did on another site for their system.
cat /proc/asound/pcm
00-04: Intel ICH - IEC958 : Intel 82801DB-ICH4 - IEC958 : playback 1
00-03: Intel ICH - ADC2 : Intel 82801DB-ICH4 - ADC2 : capture 1
00-02: Intel ICH - MIC2 ADC : Intel 82801DB-ICH4 - MIC2 ADC : capture 1
00-01: Intel ICH - MIC ADC : Intel 82801DB-ICH4 - MIC ADC : capture 1
00-00: Intel ICH : Intel 82801DB-ICH4 : playback 1 : capture 1
arecord --list-devices
**** List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices ****
card 0: I82801DBICH4 [Intel 82801DB-ICH4], device 0: Intel ICH [Intel 82801DB-ICH4]
Subdevices: 0/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
card 0: I82801DBICH4 [Intel 82801DB-ICH4], device 1: Intel ICH - MIC ADC [Intel 82801DB-ICH4 - MIC ADC]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
card 0: I82801DBICH4 [Intel 82801DB-ICH4], device 2: Intel ICH - MIC2 ADC [Intel 82801DB-ICH4 - MIC2 ADC]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
card 0: I82801DBICH4 [Intel 82801DB-ICH4], device 3: Intel ICH - ADC2 [Intel 82801DB-ICH4 - ADC2]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
arecord -f dat -D hw:0,1 -d 20 test.wav
Recording WAVE 'test.wav' : Signed 16 bit Little Endian, Rate 48000 Hz, Stereo
arecord: pcm_read:1473: read error: Input/output error
arecord -f dat -D hw:0,2 -d 20 test.wav
Recording WAVE 'test.wav' : Signed 16 bit Little Endian, Rate 48000 Hz, Stereo
arecord: pcm_read:1473: read error: Input/output error
In each case above, the file test.wav is 44 bytes
but,
arecord -f dat -D hw:0,3 -d 20 test.wav
the file test.wav is 3840044 bytes but has no sound when I play it back.
I have no idea how to use alsamixer, so I do not know if there is a problem there or what.
I downloaded a script called alsa-info.sh and ran it. It gave extensive information about my system, but I could not understand most
of what it output and how to identify my problem from the information.
######### Snip of initial info from alsa-info.sh run ################
upload=true&script=true&cardinfo=
!!################################
!!ALSA Information Script v 0.4.56
!!################################
!!Script ran on: Sun Jun 21 23:34:42 UTC 2009
!!Linux Distribution
!!------------------
CentOS release 5 (Final) CentOS release 5 (Final)
!!DMI Information
!!---------------
Manufacturer: HP Pavilion 061
Product Name: DN008A-ABA a307x
!!Kernel Information
!!------------------
Kernel release: 2.6.18-128.1.14.el5
Operating System: GNU/Linux
Architecture: i686
Processor: i686
SMP Enabled: Yes
!!ALSA Version
!!------------
Driver version: 1.0.14rc3
Library version: 1.0.17a
Utilities version: 1.0.17
!!Loaded ALSA modules
!!-------------------
snd_intel8x0
!!Sound Servers on this system
!!----------------------------
ESound Daemon:
Installed - Yes (/usr/bin/esd)
Running - No
aRts:
Installed - Yes (/usr/bin/artsd)
Running - No
!!Soundcards recognised by ALSA
!!-----------------------------
0 [I82801DBICH4 ]: ICH4 - Intel 82801DB-ICH4
Intel 82801DB-ICH4 with ALC650E at irq 137
!!PCI Soundcards installed in the system
!!--------------------------------------
00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 02)
########## End Snip of initial info from alsa-info.sh run ###############
Could someone please point me in the right direction(s) to getting my microphone working? The sound works fine!
Regards,
Murrah Boswell
Thanks. Using either 64Studio 2.1 DVD image and ArtistX 7.0 DVD ISO, it
makes a bootable flash drive that proceeds to try to mount a cdrom.
The second link doesn't seem to lead to any place to download IMG files,
and it doesn't look like 64Studio provides any img files ... well, they
talk about it but don't seem to provide them ...
Ronald Stewart wrote:
> http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/
>
> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/FromImgFiles
>
>
> Thank you
>
> Ronald Stewart
> Creative Director
> Trinity Audio Group Inc.
> 9854 National Blvd. #322
> Los Angeles CA 90034
> 310-733-9285
> ronaldjstewart(a)gmail.com <mailto:ronaldjstewart@gmail.com>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 6:39 PM, david <gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
> <mailto:gnome@hawaii.rr.com>> wrote:
>
> I thought I had kept the email, but can't find it now. I Googled, and
> tried one method that claimed to work with Debian, but it only produced
> a flash drive with an unknown partition table ...
>
> What I'd LIKE to do is be able to boot 64Studio from the flash drive,
> install that, then rework the flash drive to similarly install ArtistX.
>
> The CD drive in the target laptop is going bad, and partway through the
> install process starts having problems reading from the DVD/CD. My last
> attempt left me with a semi-functional 64Studio installation, but I'd
> rather do it right ...
>
> Or can you just dd an iso image to a hard drive????
>
> This is all so complex!
>
> --
> David
> gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com <mailto:gnome@hawaii.rr.com>
> authenticity, honesty, community
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
> <mailto:Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org>
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
>
--
David
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
