Hello everyone,
I've released ddptools 0.8.5a, a set of command line programs to
create, read and export audio from DDP images for CD audio. Due to
the license of the official DDP specification these tools are not
open source, but simple "freeware" at the moment, which I hope
people will not mind too much.
Details are found at http://ddp.andreasruge.de.
The two main programs are:
1) cue2ddp - Create CD audio DDP 2.0 images from cue/wav images
Features include:
* track start, pause and index markers
* ISRC, catalog number (UPC/EAN)
* all track flags (pre-emphasis, copy permission, SCMS, 4ch)
* all CD Text fields
2) ddpinfo - Display, check and export CD audio DDP images
Features include:
* display of all content from a DDP images (except the audio)
* full PQ listing, CD Text fields
* verification fo MD5 and CRC32 checksum files
* export of audio as (Broadcast) Wave files including time stamp
and track start positions as cue points
* full DDP to cue/wav conversion, for burning or playing
I'd like to encourage everyone interested to test the programs as
hard as possible. I'm also planning on setting up a small test suite
with real world examples of cue sheets and DDP images. As you might
know cue/wave, cue/bin and DDP images come in many different
flavors, some of which are really difficult to foresee. So, if you
have software that generates either cue/wav or cue/bin images or DDP
file sets, I'd like to ask you to prepare and send me a simple
example image.
Here are the instructions:
* Any audio will do, but no more than 30 seconds please (~ 5 MB).
Set a few tracks and use all options available, like pause markers,
track indices, flags, ISRC, UPC, and especially CD Text. Fill all CD
text fields offered and make sure at least one field has a double
quote and a non-ASCII character inside.
* Let me know which software you used to create the image
* optionally: include a screen shot of the track/PQ/CD Text editor view
* send the image as compressed email attachment
Aside from that any feedback and ideas are welcome.
Best
Andreas
> Any smoke, funny smells, visible damage ? If not maybe it could be
> repaired.
A note to the OP: Test the Non-CEM, but ordinary chips using coolant
spray. Perhaps some ordinary chip is borked.
I don't think that you'll see just some puffy capacitors, OTOH IIRC your
description doesn't lead to CEM chips, so I agree with Fons.
For taking a look and using coolant spray you don't need knowledge and
old gear usually is easy to open and to put together again.
I won't reply to the replies regarding to Phasex and DSI, they're
informing. Thank you!
Regards,
Ralf
Reply to All / Reply to List
On Sunday 11 March 2012 00.26.25 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > I realize that nothing is like the real thing, but hope that i can
> > find something that's close enough, or even better.
>
> Google for survival kits and CEM/Curtis chips. If you just wish to get
> the sounds characteristics of some vintage synth and you should be
> willing to use Apple or Microsoft, than you'll find some proprietary
> soft synth there. I dunno if they will do something similar to the
> sound you need from the JX-8P. If you need the full CEM sound quality,
> than you definitively get stuck.
To late for my JX. First, every 8th (or was it 12th?) keys was stopping
to produce sound (but they still sended MIDI signals), so I was able to
use it as a MIDI controller (one of the best keyboards I ever used) and
use another MIDI controller for triggering the jx-sounds. Then I could
not do program changes, and then it stopped to make sounds - all this
within two weeks.
It does exist some Juno SW synths for MS Windows and Mac, but I won't use
it. I'm usually pragmatic and do use both Mac and Windows for work (Linux
is still main OS there also), but here, I run native Linux on everything
and don't want to run another OS in my studio.
> Better? If you expect something completely new, than yes, you might
> find something better, but if you expect something that sounds like
> vintage synth, than all soft synth are less good, far away from the
> originals.
Well, I think I might try to get a new one again but also consider to see
if I can make amSynt or even take my time to learn Yoshimi and see if it
can do the job.
Maybe a bright soul in this group is able to make a modelled JX or Juno
with convolution?
Jostein
Julien, those controllers are a good point. The KORG nanoKONTROL is very
cheap, I own one since around 1 year, but never used it, anyway, it's
known to work with Linux. If the OP has got some iThingy, there's a
MIDI-Wi-Fi driver for Linux, unfortunately I still try to get Wi-Fi
working on my machine. I assume that Wi-Fi for other Linux users does
work ;D. FWIW, IIRC for mono Calf Monosynth and for poly Phasex can
emulate some vintage synth, but still not the output of CEM chips.
Hm? Mr. Smith still has got CEM chips, anyway, what happens if you need
to replace such a chip?
Full ACK Al. We only can buy second hand analog synth that are less old
and that might still last for a while. If needed I would try to get
something similar to a Minimoog out of my Oberheim Matrix-1000, but for
doing this I need to get my Atari ST working again or I need to run
Apple, Microsoft.
Since my TG33 is borked, I hope we get some soft synth for vector
control. The TG33 sounds without the vector control are less good than
many soft synth, just the vector control adds a special quality that
can't be produced with Linux soft synth, so theoretical it should be
possible to get an TG33 emulator that is better than the original. The
TG33 hasn't good samples and the FM synthesis isn't comparable to my
DX7, but the TG33's FM synthesis might be comparable to the output of
Hexter.
James, Whysynth is very useful, but completely no help to get something
Roland like. YMMV!
An interesting and scary thread.
Regards,
Ralf
On 03/10/2012 05:56 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> No soft synth will reach the sound of CEM microchips or Yamaha FM
> synthesis.
>
> We get stuck if our old synth get broken.
How true! I've done a LOT of searching for a softsynth that will get
one or two sounds of my Moogs. I've found some that sound "good." I
get thinking that they are just about "it." And then I fire up one of
the Moogs and compare, and find out just how different they are.
One odd thing that I've consistently noticed over the past few years, is
that if I find a good MiniMoog emulation, and match settings on it for
one of my favorites on a Model D, is that, when listening to the
emulation, it sounds very close. But, if I run each through a channel
strip so I can directly A/B them, I find that the emulation is muddy and
has no distinction. I have to roll a LOT of high end off of the real on
to get the two channels to be even close.
--
---
http://www.lateralforce.com
My blog, with commentary on a variety of things, including audio,
mixing, equipment, etc, is at:
http://audioandmore.wordpress.com
Staat heißt das kälteste aller kalten Ungeheuer. Kalt lügt es auch;
und diese Lüge kriecht aus seinem Munde: 'Ich, der Staat, bin das Volk.'
- [Friedrich Nietzsche]
> I realize that nothing is like the real thing, but hope that i can
> find something that's close enough, or even better.
Google for survival kits and CEM/Curtis chips. If you just wish to get
the sounds characteristics of some vintage synth and you should be
willing to use Apple or Microsoft, than you'll find some proprietary
soft synth there. I dunno if they will do something similar to the sound
you need from the JX-8P. If you need the full CEM sound quality, than
you definitively get stuck.
For FM synth, Linux provides Hexter, the characteristics are close to a
DX7, but far away to it's sound quality. I don't know any Linux synth
emulator that has anything to do with an old analog synth. They are nice
synth, but without the intensity of vintage analog synth. For Apple and
Microsoft you'll find some analog synth emulations that are comparable
to the difference between Hexter and a DX7. You won't get closer to
vintage synth than that.
Better? If you expect something completely new, than yes, you might find
something better, but if you expect something that sounds like vintage
synth, than all soft synth are less good, far away from the originals.
There isn't a voodoo soft synth, they all sound similar to the soft
synth you already tested.
Regards,
Ralf
Hi,
cannot set tick on /dev/rtc permission denied
How important is it to solve this? It seems /dev/rtc is not in the
Debian kernel, are there (lowlatency / RT) kernels for Debian with this
feature included?
Regards,
\r
Laborejo, Esperanto for "Workshop", is used to craft music through notation.
It is a Lilypond GUI frontend, a MIDI creator and finally a tool collection to inspire and help you compose.
It works by reducing music-redundancy and by seperating layout and data. Don't worry about the layout, just concentrate on the music.
Screenshot (Laborejo and Lilypond, side by side): http://www.laborejo.org/images/screenshots/2012-01-31-223820_3840x1080_scro…
This is the first release, version number 0.1
Download: https://github.com/nilsgey/Laborejo/tarball/0.1
Dependencies: http://www.laborejo.org/documentation
There are too many features to mention them all and too many missing features and bugs to warn you. Most important known problems:
* This is Alpha Grade Software. Don't use for long-term work. However, the produced midis and PDFs will last forever.
* Performance can get bad very quickly if you use Containers.
* There is no built-in sophisticated midi player/jack midi output yet. You have to export midi files.
* Documentation is nearly non-existent.
Have fun, it would be nice to hear from you!
Nils
http://www.laborejo.org
(All kinds of crazy social web services are linked there!)