On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 12:00 +0000,
linux-audio-user-request(a)lists.linuxaudio.org wrote:
> Message: 13
> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:32:50 +0100
> From: Jeremy Jongepier <autostatic(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [LAU] aj-snapshot daemon
> To: linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
> Message-ID: <4F5E4F62.5030309(a)autostatic.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 03/12/2012 08:23 PM, Jari Suominen wrote:
> > Hello! You have any suggestion how you would like aj-snapshot to
> work?
> > I think this sounds like an interesting use case.
>
> Hello Jari,
>
> Actually no suggestions, aj-snapshot works fine for me as it is. I
> just
> don't use the daemon as I don't need it actually.
>
> Best,
>
> Jeremy
+1
Please don't make tools like jack_snapshot and aj-snapshot to other
session handlers. Regarding to the many changes in the Linux world I
don't make music anymore, but spend time to fix one unneeded issue after
the other. I prefer if at least the old reliable production audio tools
would keep solid as a rock.
- Ralf
Hi,
My Roland JX-8P is dead, and it's getting harder and harder and more
expensive to get new ones that's reliable and repairable. I got my first
one back in 1987 and the last one 3 years ago. I'm looking for the pad
and strings/brass sounds that synths like Juno 60/106 and JX-8P could
produce. You wonder what on earth I'm talking about? Watch, or listen to
this, it totally rocks:
http://www.retrosound.de/The_Roland_JX-8P_demo.htm
The problem is that there's nothing quite like them AFAIK and I'm lost
when it come to tweak synths like for example zynaddsubfx/yoshimi wich
seem to be able to deliver. Another one, Loomer Aspect, is one that i
might tweak, but it does not work in my Ubuntu 10.04 studio.
So my question is: Does it exist a real Linux analog-sounding,
subtractive, chrash free and maintained SW synth that can match or
substitute the HW above? I've sniffed at great synths like amSynth, AMS,
but they don't sound that 8P-ish in my ears - on the other hand, it might
be me that's not good at tweaking them. Is it anybody here who knows both
the great analogue sounding Rolands and sw synths that can put me in the
right direction?
Thanks, Jostein
Hi all,
I seem to recall that setting qjackctl's 'midi driver' option to 'seq' is
supposed to make a copy of all the midi ports in the 'alsa midi' tab under
the 'jack midi' tab. This used to work fine for me, but bafflingly doesn't
seem to work now. The ports simply don't appear as they should, whatsoever.
If I can't fix it, I guess I'll just start using a2jmidid instead, but I'd
prefer to use Jack's internal solution. Any ideas why this might not be
working, how to fix it, or where to investigate? Thanks!
James
Hi,
Aj-snapshot -d, could be a more flexible replacement for qjackctl
patchbay, the only problem here: it does not work. It doesn't make the
connections being stored after launching the app (yoshimi).
Anyone having success with this stuff?
\r
sry, wrong list.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Adler <david.jo.adler(a)gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:23 AM
Subject: Re: [LAU] ardour: select between markers?
To: ardour-users(a)lists.ardour.org
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Aaron L. wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> Just trying to select the stuff between 2 markers.
>
> How does one do this?
>
> (I'm searching......not finding much.)
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Aaron
In the "Snap/Grid Mode" dropdown menu, select either
"Grid" or "Magnetic" and in the "Snap/Grid Mode" menu
next to it, select "Markers"
best,
d
Le 11/03/2012 23:17, Aaron L. a écrit :
> Hello all.
>
> Just trying to select the stuff between 2 markers.
>
> How does one do this?
>
> (I'm searching......not finding much.)
>
Hi Aaron,
right clic on the 1st marker
create range to next maker
then right clic on range marker
select all in range / select range (for the active track)
you may have to display the range line with a right clic in the area
above the master track ?
right clic is your friend for a lot of stuff in Ardour, Alt+K too...
HTH,
Fred
--
Ah, si chaque grain de sable choisissait d'apporter sa goutte d'eau, hein ?
Hi list, I'm looking into building a new desktop, and possibly buy a new
sound card, and I'd like some advice.
Right now I'm using an Acer Aspire laptop, with an intel core 2 Duo
T5500 - 1.66Ghz and 2gb of ram, and a Rig Kontrol 2 USB sound card.
What I'd like to do is have one or two audio inputs, apply [possibly
lots of] real time effects (like rakarrack and ladspa), have some
samplers/synths playing, maybe a loop program, and record to disk. I
probably wouldn't be doing frequently all these things together, but
I'd like if possible a system that could, if needed, handle it. With my
current setup even parts of this is very difficult (especially the real
time effects part) and gets me plenty of xruns.
Am I correct in assuming that the source of xruns is double: from the
soundcard chip when the jack daemon is invoked with low latency
settings (possibly too much for said chip) and from the CPU when there
is too much DSP going on?
I'm asking this because, being on a budget, I'm wondering if I'd be
better off with keeping my Rig Kontrol 2 and getting an i5 2500k CPU or
getting a lesser CPU but a better sound card... I know it's a difficult
question with no straight answers, just wanted to hear some opinions.
And while we are at it, do you have any other particular suggestions
for building a desktop with my audio needs? For example is
overclocking ability something to search for in a CPU? Online there is
of course an overwhelming quantity of info, but most is targeted to
people building computers to play games.
best wishes,
renato
Hello everyone and Fons in particular!
OK, it is rather late to give feedback, but I just managed to get some use
out of these ladspa plugins.
I was especially experimenting with the unique ID 1954, REC-vco plugin. When
I didn't get the expected result with the sync audio input port, I hunted for
the readme and tried to check, if I perhaps thought it was for a different
purpose and then I saw, that at the time it was thought to be experimental.
So: is the sync port for a typical sync'ed osciallator sound? I tried
different things with it and either got no result or harsh sounding results,
that sounded more like some sort of ringmod or FM, i.e. in this case
destructive. :-)
I fed the audio signal from another oscillator into it, starting at the same
pitch and going up. Result: a short uncertainty in the beginning, as if a
short env had been applied to the pitch and then this FM-ish sound.
I treid to feed a straight line into it going slowly from 1 to pitch. No
good at all. Well, it was just to make sure. :-)
Another thing I'm not too sure about the the waveform control input. I
changed its value from -1 to 1 in a straight line and no effect.
But thanks for these osciallators. They now not only look like interesting
and helpful gear, they are!
Warm regards
Julien
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Such Is Life: Very Intensely Adorable;
Free And Jubilating Amazement Revels, Dancing On - FLOWERS!
====== Find my music at ======
http://juliencoder.de/nama/music.html
.....................................
"If you live to be 100, I hope I live to be 100 minus 1 day,
so I never have to live without you." (Winnie the Pooh)
i recently built a 64 bit Ubuntu studio machine, and am looking for 64
bit packages - the Linux sampler home page only has 32 bit though.
does anyone know where i might find a package, compiled either for
Ubuntu or Debian?
cheers
--
robin
http://bumblepuppy.org/blog/?p=237 - government bill to remove basic
human rights in NZ