I was very excited to find a video of the
complete
Tristan and Isolde on YouTube recently,
complete with
English subtitles.
I used the youtube-dl utility to grab the video,
but
when I began playing the copy on my hard-drive
with
totem, to my horror, the English subtitles
were
not there! To repeat, the subtitles are on
youtube.com but not in the .webm file that
I
downloaded with youtube-dl.
Can someone coach me how to download a version
with the English subtitles? Or are there subtitles
in my downloaded version and totem is just not
playing them?
Thank you for your help.
P.S. On the totem menu under View, there
is a
command called Subtitles
but this prompts me for
another file.
Is there a subtitle file in addition
to
the video file that I need to download from
youtube? Thanks again.
Hi all!
I found this old discussion about the Zoom R16 in the archive of LAU.
http://linuxaudio.org/mailarchive/lau/2012/3/14/188926
Strangely, in that archive there is a missing reply from Mr. Brett McCoy.
(You can find the missing one a the bottom of this archive:
http://linux-audio.4202.n7.nabble.com/Zoom-R16-td7748.html )
Mr. McCoy claims to have enabled the Zoom R8 (yes, there is quite a
difference between r16 and r8) as a multi-input soundcard for ardour and
also as a control surface in 12.04 64bits.
There is no information as to which driver is being in use in his post. And
searching the web only leads me to various WIP to get the R16 running on
linux.
My question is, has anyone got any news about this device and a possible
drivers?
Specifically to Mr. Brett McCoy: what driver did you use to make jack aware
of your r8?
Thank full for any hints, yours,
--
Set Hallström
AKA
reSet Sakrecoer
http://sakrecoer.com
Hi all,
My dual Delta 1010 setup is on its last legs and I'm thinking (again) of
retooling with a Saffire Pro 40. I've been bitten in the past by upgrades
like this which is why I'm still on the 1010s, but there's only so many
times I can repair them before I have to admit defeat.
Is anyone out there actively using a Saffire Pro 40 in a serious setting?
Is it reliable for low latency, with all channels working at once? Does it work
with any recent ffado, or do you need specific versions, patches or anything
else?
I've read plenty of vague comments about which firewire chipsets might be
good or not, but are there known-good PCI Express firewire cards that are a
sensible price and work well?
I'm really hoping for "Yes, I've been using one for a year and it's rock
solid," rather than "I've googled and it claims to be supported," or "Yes,
it's fine if you pull the latest beta7 branch from git and only use Acme
2000 firewire interfaces." Sorry to sound unduly cautious or skeptical ;)
In short, if I bite the bullet, retire my Delta 1010s and buy a Pro 40, are
the drivers and tools now at the stage where I reasonably expect to be up and
running again in a day rather than still fighting problems a week later?
Cheers,
bjb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
this is something that has annoyed me endlessly for years, and i still
haven't found a solution.
the issue is minor (that's why i haven't asked before), but annoying
nevertheless.
so:
i'm using qjackctl with the "system tray icon" enabled.
when i close the application window, qjackctl keeps running and is
accessible via the system tray.
cool. that's what i want.
however, every single time i close the main qjackctl window, a balloon
pops up in my notification area, telling me that the "program will
keep running in the system tray" and how to really shut it down.
the first time i read this, this information was informative (i
suppose, it has been years). but no longer.
i already know that the program will keep running. that's why i'm
using the system tray. there's no need to tell me again and again
(even within a single session!).
there *must* be simple way to "not show this message again", without
completely disabling tray notifications. but how?
btw, this is on Debian/sid with xfce4.
fgasdmr
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=ertZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Feb 14, 2015 5:48 AM, Len Ovens <len(a)ovenwerks.net> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2015, anders.vinjar(a)bek.no wrote:
>
> > The real pain here is having to do 32-bit at all! If we only got lw to
> > consider 64-bit a 'professional' feature, and not just a high-end
> > 'enterprise' feature... :-/
Even my wife's years-discontinued little netbook is 64-bit.
> With some distros talking about dropping support for 32bit kernels, 64bit
> is just where the world is going anymore. 32bit versions are just
> outdated.
>
> As someone who uses old computers for servers etc. I find this anoying...
I do wish kernel makers would also stop requiring PAE support. I have a couple of boxes that don't support PAE.
Musix is 32-bit only.
I expect Debian will be producing 32-bit kernels for a good long while yet. They just seem to change slower than others.
David W. Jones
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
http://dancingtreefrog.com
> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 17:18:35 +0100
> From: sub <subvertao(a)inventati.org>
> Message-ID: <54EF475B.8040601(a)inventati.org>
> i received a mail from the band in which they tell me
> that the mix is faster and at a higher pitch than the
> audio they recorded through a video camera at the
> concert.
Video cameras record at 48k rate, so someone will need to rate convert.
Either the camera audio will need to be converted to 44.1k or your audio
will need to be converted to 48k.
Which you choose probably does not matter, but everyone involved needs to
know and agree on the chosen project sample rate.
If the final output will be a video then converting every thing to 48k is
probably the easiest choice. If the final output will be a CD (or audio
only files) then probably 44.1k is the easiest choice. If you will have
both a video and audio only files, my choice would be working in 48k and
then sample rate convert the final mix to 44.1k for CD.
--
Chris Caudle
Hey, Everybody--
i loaded bristol with a scala (.scl) file, this morning. That much worked
fine. However, both my midi keyboard and the gui keyboard are nowhere near
middle C. i've even tuned my midi keyboard up (a maximum) three octaves,
and my middle C is still two octaves too low. Can this be prevented or
adjusted in anyway?
Thanks!
bill
Hei.
I am running linux on a Debian machine with kx repositories, connected
to a Mackie Onyx 1640-i.
Linux kx 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt4-3 (2015-02-03) x86_64
GNU/Linux
04:00.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB43AB23
IEEE-1394a-2000 Controller (PHY/Link)
When i record multitrack audio using Ardour and jackd, i see that the
sample frequency is set to 44100.
The audio files are also at 44100, according to file:
root@kx:/home/humla/akt3bolger/interchange/akt3bolger/audiofiles# file
bass-2.wav
<head> bass-2.wav: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, mono 44100 Hz
After doing a mix of the material on a separate machine using Ardour3 at
44100, and dumping the mix internally to a 44100 WAV, i received a mail
from the band in which they tell me that the mix is faster and at a
higher pitch than the audio they recorded through a video camera at the
concert.
When i playback audio from the linux machine (like mp3s ) through the
firewire and the Onyx console, i get random switches of speed and pitch.
I have been working in professional audio, and i know there must be a
problem with the sample frequency lock and synch between the two
devices, so that one is on the wrong sample frequency, and "translates"
the bitstream wrongly. Normally in a digital audio chain you have a
machine that is "master" and one that is "slave".
The problem here is that the console has no display showing the sample
frequency it is locked at, and the Linux machine does not show any
master / slave feature in jack or ardour.
There is something strange going on here.
The machine has also another analog audio card:
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio
Controller (rev 02)
And i don't know how this could influence the setup.
I play keyboard in a band, and use UbuntuStudio on a laptop for softsynths,
effects, and most importantly, MIDI routing (via mididings). Across the
room is our studio computer, which runs Windows. I am running audio out of
my laptop via a Presonus FirePod (aka FP10), which works fine. The studio
computer has a Presonus FireStudio and Digimax, which are joined by an ADAT
lightpipe. Both the FirePod and FireStudio have SPDIF ports. At the
moment, audio is traveling via audio cables from the hardware synths and
laptop across the room to the studio computer. However, it seems like I
have everything in place to have a "simpler" setup, at least from a wiring
and D/A/D conversion standpoint, by using NetJack to send digital audio via
a crossover cable from my laptop to the studio computer. The plan would be:
*The FireStudio (on the studio computer) must have its clock synced to the
Digimax via ADAT.
*The FirePod (laptop) can be synced via SPDIF to the FireStudio. Thus, all
audio hardware will be on one master clock without any effort from the
computers.
*Use the FirePod to capture audio from the hardware synths.
*Use NetJack(1|2) to route audio from the laptop (both captured from the
hardware synths, and from softsynths) to the studio computer, via an
Ethernet crossover cable.
The last step is where I am running in to trouble.
For starters, NetJack(1|2) does not seem to be designed for the use case
where the sound cards on two networked computers are actually synced in
hardware; thus the normal operating mode where only the master can access
its audio hardware. So far, my plan is to use NetJack2, with the laptop as
master and the studio computer as slave. I have thought of either using
audioadapter with the net backend on the slave, or of using netadapter with
the alsa backend. Both of these do resampling to compensate for drifting
clocks. My first set of questions is: In the case that the clocks on the
master and slave hardware are already synced, do audioadapter and
netadapter still spend significant CPU time on resampling overhead? Which
one is likely to be more reliable/less resource intensive? Can netadapter
receive MIDI? Is there some other software that would be better?
I currently have Jack 1.9.10 installed on both computers, and they work
fine individually. They are configured with static IPs on the crossover
cable, and are at least able to ping each other. However, I have not been
able to get NetJack2 to connect using either computer as the master.