Hi all
Does anyone have experience with the uTrack24?
Specifically
1) thoughts on audio quality
2) works with Linux?
3) do you need a computer to have use it as 24 in 2 out with control over
mix?
https://cymaticaudio.com/utrack24-productpage/
I was thinking pairing with a few of these (or similar) for 24 channels of
modular into the computer
https://nw2s.net/products/nw2s-io
Atte
I'm pleased to announce the release of guitarix2-0.40.0
A virtual guitar amplifier for Linux running with jack (Jack Audio
Connection Kit) released under the
GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation;
either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
This is a major release.
It comes with a overall source rework/refactoring by Andreas Degert.
Changes are so far:
- updated to GTK(mm)3 by Hubert Figuière and Andreas Degert
- Port all included LV2 plugin GUI's to X11/cairo by Hermann Meyer
- Add support for lv2:enabled (Bypass) in several LV2 plugs by
Hermann Meyer
- Add Midi feedback support by Hermann Meyer
- Add new PowerAmp module by Hermann Meyer
- Fix several Bug's and hopefully don't introduce to much new one's
You could get it here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/guitarix/
or here:
https://github.com/brummer10/guitarix
regards
hermann
Hi!
I want to give some thumbs up to the LiSP (Linux Show Player) gang! The
weird thing is that I don't know how overdue this is. I asked them on
this list some years ago if the program supported multi-channel or
multi-tracks, the answer that time was no, so I gave it up.
But today, I checked again. I downloaded the AppImage, made a
multichannel FLAC file and voila: -It worked! Now, the artist can have
his/her own backing track (with count ins, pilot tones, etc) and the
audience another one. Great!
So.. Thank you LiSP! :-)
It's other people to thank as well, giants such as Fons Adriansen, Paul
Davis, Rui Nuno Capela, Hermann Meyer, Dave Phillips, and countless
others (already starting to regret the name dropping). I think I'm gonna
sit down and send good thoughts to all of you (no money - I'm broke) and
I'm so grateful for what you have done and are doing. Big thanks to you
too, you have made my life as a Pragmatic Open Source Fanatic easier and
easier for every year! <3
Jostein
Hi list !
This is my first message here.
I am currently trying to set up a live ambisonics mixing desk equivalent
with Pure Data and [vstplugin~] object.
Most of the work is done with the IEM suite and some SPARTA plugins, but
i'd like to evaluate all the plugins i can.
I tried to compile Matthias Kronlachner ambiX and mcfx plugins but failed
miserably, mostly due to GCC 9.1 incompatibilities.
Does anybody have both ambiX and/or mcfx compiled for Ubuntu 20.04 x86_64 ?
I'd prefer VST version for the sake of consistency but LV2 would be ok too,
i guess.
Thanks !
Baptiste
Hey hey,
this is another Csound composition, a virtual scene:
https://youtu.be/LGaynaBbTVw
Youshould listen on headphones and, if possible, keep rather still. :)
The image that I tried to build is of a large hall, where the listener hangs
in the air at the centre of a sphere constructed of metal balls connected by
wires. At the front wall there stands a group of wooden pipes or huge
clarinets that, after a while, begin a procession around the listener.
Occasionally they fire a kind of table tennis ball like fireworks. Along the
side walls there are metal bars, applauding the pipes.
On the other hand, you might just hear it as an abstract composition or
whatever suites you. For the eternally curious there is the full Csound source
code available, everything is synthesized, no samples have been harmed in this
rendition:
http://juliencoder.de/nama/cylinders_and_spheres.zip
Enjoy and best wishes,
Jeanette
--
* Website: http://juliencoder.de - for summer is a state of sound
* Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMS4rfGrTwz8W7jhC1Jnv7g
* SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/jeanette_c
* Twitter: https://twitter.com/jeanette_c_s
* Audiobombs: https://www.audiobombs.com/users/jeanette_c
* GitHub: https://github.com/jeanette-c
Can't you see I'm a fool in so many ways <3
(Britney Spears)
Hi Everyone, I'm back!
How do I get Rhythmbox (GNOME application similar to iTunes) to appear
in qjackctl?
To recap: I'm trying to take the output of music playing from Rhythmbox
and combine that with my microphone (either onboard laptop or bluetooth
headset) to pipe both into the Jitsi Meet videoconference service[1].
Thanks again to everyone who has been helping me thus far. Based on the
feedback I received, I'm going to try to solve my issue using JACK.
Over the past few days, I have been doing more research, reading wiki
pages and watching YouTube videos to become more familiar with JACK and
the various tools. Thus far, I have:
- installed qjackctl and its dependencies on Ubuntu 16.04
- updated /etc/security/limits.conf with:
@audio - rtprio 95
@audio - memlock unlimited
per these instructions[2]
- added my userid to the audio group
- installed pulseaudio-module-jack
- installed gstreamer1.0-plugins.bad
- I have NOT installed the low latency kernel
I can now start the JACK server without any XRUNS after changing my
Output and Input devices to hw:PCH but I can't get Rhythmbox to appear
under "Readable Clients/Output Port" in the Connections window in
qjackctl. I'm struggling to figure out how to set these GStreamer
values[3] assuming that this is even the solution to my problem.
Any pointers in the right direction would be appreciated.
Thanks
Samir
[1]
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/archives/linux-audio-user/2020-May/113035.html
[2] https://jackaudio.org/faq/linux_rt_config.html
[3] https://jackaudio.org/faq/gstreamer_via_jack.html
On Tue, May 19, 2020 4:47 am, Christoph Kuhr wrote:
> Does it matter whether it's only the cable side or the
> transition from ethernet to cable?
Only to the extent of estimating whether that is the actual range of
latency to expect from your house to the upstream router, or whether there
is additional latency added on to that as a minimum.
> But I can confirm ~35ms on the first hop with my cable access...
Is that 35ms one way, or round trip? Is that the value reported from
traceroute? I'm looking at that now at my house, but I'm not familiar
with how to interpret the numbers, I will need to study the man page a
bit.
But if the interpretation is as obvious as it seems then it seems like the
system in our neighborhood has not bad latency after the latest upgrades.
> Where did you find that info?
Google search found a document at CableLabs titled "DOCSIS Technologies
for Mobile Backhaul" discussing considerations for using cable based
network as the connection for small cell phone stations. Similar
considerations for conversations as for music, if the latency is too long
you begin to speak over each other, conversation timing is awkward, etc.
so seemed like a relevant document.
https://www.cablelabs.com/docsis-mobile-backhaul-white-paperhttps://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/1697621/DOCSIS-Technologies-For-Mobile-BackH…
best regards,
Chris Caudle