Anyone using any of these Digital Audio Lab cards with ALSA? Their status
is listed as unknown on the ALSA site.
Matthew Polashek
****************************************************************************
This email may contain confidential material.
If you were not an intended recipient,
please notify the sender and delete all copies.
We may monitor email to and from our network.
****************************************************************************
The latest version of the realtime Linux Security Module is now
available on SourceForge...
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/realtime-lsm/realtime-lsm-0.1.1.tar.gz?d…
This release handles changes to the capabilities structure introduced
in Linux 2.6.6, but still works with earlier 2.6 kernels. There are
no functional changes. Unless you are running 2.6.6, there is no need
to upgrade. Changes in the 2.6.6 kernel makefiles affect the
procedure for building the realtime-lsm. Please consult the INSTALL
instructions for details.
The realtime LSM is an installable kernel module that enables realtime
capabilities for any 2.6 kernel without needing to directly patch the
kernel. It was written by Torben Hohn and Jack O'Quin, who make no
warranty concerning the safety, security or even stability of your
system when using it. It is provided under the provisions of the GPL.
--
joq
Eric Rz. wrote:
> If i'm not mistaken the 2496 is an ice1712 based card. You should use
> envy24control instead of alsamixer. Things will make much more sense. Be
> sure to check out the command line options available to limit the number
> of channels it displays.
Yes, I have one of those cards, too. Nice. Good quality audio. It is ice1712
based and envy24control works fine.
Hmm, I had a look for the command line options for envy24control in the man
page. Couldn't find anything to adjust number of input channels displayed.
That's with the alsa-tools-0.9.0rc6-53 that comes with SuSE 8.2. Maybe a
later one adds them? My envy24control shows all 10 PCM input channels of the
internal ice1712, even though the Audiophile-2496 only has 2 analog and SPDIF
digital (2 channels) inputs from the outside world. I haven't explored all
permutations and combinations of the panels.
Elsewhere, I've grumbled about the "lack of integration" between apps like
audacity and xmms volume slider and the envy24control. The volume sliders on
the apps are "dead". You MUST control the volume on the envy24control. Dunno
if that's a permanent condition? ...likely to get fixed? how?
(...unless someone else has some more info and/or pointers for us?)
BTW, I think I also had a "lock up" problem when trying to change clock source
between internal and SPDIF (back to internal?), using envy24control. I had to
"kick it around" before the change would "take". I'm not sure if SPDIF stuff
works, or is supported. I had other problems to fix, so I didn't pursue that
any farther. Sorry. I have a Johnson J-Station (guitar amp modeler) which
could provide SPDIF outputs, but I'm currently running its analog outputs
through a Peavey RQ-200 6 channel mixer into the Audiophile-2496 analog PCM 1
& 2 inputs. That works well enough, and I'm not desperate for more channels.
Converting A/D/A/D doesn't seem that bad, but I haven't listened that
closely. Good enough for the likes of me. I can put off wrestling with SPDIF
for a (long?) while. The engineer in me likes to see everything work.
> envy24control comes in the alsa-tools package.
--
Juhan Leemet
Logicognosis, Inc.
>
> From: Daniel James <daniel(a)mondodesigno.com>
> Date: 2004/05/13 Thu AM 08:27:37 GMT
> To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu>,
> <ico(a)fuse.net>
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] New sound scheme for the Linux Desktop
>
> > I've come up with this new theme titled "Borealis."
>
> Sounds good to me - definitely an improvement. I heard Brian Eno did
> the start-up sound for Windows 95, so now we've got real competition
> on the desktop!
>
> Cheers
>
> Daniel
>
>
Thanks all for your very kind words! :-)
Best wishes,
Ico
Quoting Daniel James <daniel(a)mondodesigno.com>:
> Hello Sampo,
>
> > sxpress is for controlling MMC compatible software & hardware with
> > USB DAW controllers. The DAW controller is interfaced through the
> > Linux input event API and MMC is sent via the ALSA sequencer.
>
> This sounds very interesting - which controllers have you tested it
> with?
>
I have a Contour Shuttle Xpress. It's the more-than-modest controller from
Contour, it has a jog/wheel, dial and 5 buttons. It's enough for me.
The configuration I use is as an example in the .tar.gz. It has
start/stop/rewind/punch recording, MMC locate (dial) and varispeed control
(jog/wheel). I use it with Ardour.
Sampo
Hello!
My DAW controller project is now stable enough for a small-scale
release. So, here it is:
sxpress is for controlling MMC compatible software & hardware with USB
DAW controllers. The DAW controller is interfaced through the Linux
input event API and MMC is sent via the ALSA sequencer.
Get it at:
http://www.helsinki.fi/~stsavola/software/sxpress-0.1.tar.gz
Please try it out. Feel free to comment!
Sampo
Hi all,
I've been messing the other day with figuring out new sounds that would "enhance the Linux desktop experience" (namely KDE, but obviously usable with any desktop that supports sound events) since the ones we currently have IMHO sound a bit too obtrusive.
Anyhow, I've come up with this new theme titled "Borealis." It is available for immediate download on the KDE-look website:
http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=12584
An .ogg preview of the start-up sound can be found here:
http://meowing.ccm.uc.edu/~ico/Linux/Borealis.ogg
Any comments and/or suggestions are most welcome and appreciated!
Best wishes,
Ico
CheeseTracker is a mature,versatile and extremely full-featured application
that works as an all-in-one sequencer/sampler/sample editor/fx processor. It
allows for the creation of professional sounding multitrack mixes.
It includes examples and docummentation, as well as on-line help.
It can be obtained at http://cheesetronic.sf.net
Sorry for the delay, even though this was ready some months ago, I didnt have
time to fix up a proper release..
Changes for this version follow:
-New (still scons-based) build system, should be easier to use..
-Fixed OSS detection for REAL
-Disabled RtAudio, must reenable it at least for OSX, but that will be
version 1.0.0
-All engine converted to floating point, may be a bit slower on pre p4/athlon
computers, though a bit more accurate
-Old FX core deprecated, sorry, this wont load effects on pre-9.9 songs,
though it will keep the routes.
-Added shift-f6, play pattern from cursor
-Added sample-being-played notification in sample screen.
-Fixed wave-loading bug, should work until i get libaudiofile working
-Fixed ugly bug in GXX introduced in 0.9.1
-More resamplers (FM/Cosine/Cubic Spline).
-Doubled filter range.
-Managed to reduce the source file size a bit
-NEW FILTERS!!! rewrote the filters, they are MUCH better now.. choose
between lowpass/bandpass/hipass/notch
-New Effect: Multiband (6/10/21/31) equalizer.
-New effect!: Distortion (with many distortion modes)
-New effect! Pitch Shifter (not amazing, but very tweakeable)
-New effect! Stereo FX (kickass post-production helper)
-New bugs! report them please!
Enjoy!
Juan Linietsky
Hi all,
this is my first post on the list, so I'll introduce myself shortly. I
play (bass guitar) in a punk rock band with a drum machine (an old Boss
DR-5). We are kind of limited by the drumbox, because of the small
memory size (200 patterns, 20 songs), the non-extensible and boring drum
kits and the lack of certain features. As a system administrator with a
bits of programming knowledge (I know Perl, a bit of C and some other
useful things) and a free software fan, I said to myself : let's get a
software drum machine on a laptop, it should have unlimited features.
So far I looked at a number of projects, but none is usable on stage.
Here's what I need :
1/ A simple programming interface (Hydrogen is perfect). It can also be
something like a simple programming language editable in a text editor.
2/ For length-fixed songs, it's just a playback of a .wav, no problems.
3/ On some songs, we stop the drumbox, play a bit, and start it again.
When I hit the stop pedal, it stops immediately (and therefore I need to
hit "reset" to be sure to be at the beginning of the pattern when it
starts again). It would like it to stop at the end of the pattern if I
hit the stop button.
4/ It should "know" the song structure:
"start" : plays part1 of song
"stop" : stops :)
"start" : again part1
"stop" : still stops
"start" : plays part2 of song
5/ We need programmable tempo changes.
6/ Big display, playlist control, easy to load songs ! We're on stage,
it's dark,, there is smoke, and it's not very practical to
"file/open/click/click/click..." with a guitar in the hand and people
jumping over you. Song name should be displayed BIG (full screen), the
name of the next song should be already programmed, so I just have to
press space (or a pedal wired to the parallel or whatever port) to jump
to the next song.
I just spoke about a pedal. I can build a "stop/start, next song" pedal
and code something that reads events and make it to the audio app.
For some songs, just chaining two or three .wav files works well enough.
But when it comes to things more elaborate, I have been unable to find
something appropriate.
== The point is to have something simple to use on stage. ==
I imagine a little program that feeds a software drumbox MIDI (or JACK?)
events for stop/start/jumpto/tempo changes. I just don't want to
reinvent the wheel.
If someone has something that does the job or some hints/useful
libraries/glue, I would be happy !
Thanks for your reading, enjoy music !
--
Charles
you can listen to some of my music on http://www.raia.info/
(french web site, sorry for non-french-speaking people)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-audio-user-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu [mailto:linux-audio-
> user-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Dan Harper
>
>
> I haven't used Audacity much, but as far as I know, some differences
> are:
> - Audacity is easier to use.
For me Audacity is only good for editing samples/sound files.
Using it as the many HDR for your DAW is not an option (yet). Lack of
realtime effect sends, bussing, automation, etc. would make it difficult
for me to suggest to anyone to use audacity as the center piece to their
DAW. That being said, it's a great program for what it does (I use at
home (linux CCRMA) and at work (winXP) for sample tweaking and editing.
_________________________________________________
Scanned on 11 May 2004 15:54:01
Scanning by http://erado.com