Hi:
Last nite I read that article in SosPubs about Linux. Most
folks in that article seemed to be using the RME HDSP 9652. I have been
looking at the MultiFace for awhile, but am starting to feel that the
best option would be to sink my money into some of the preamp/ADAT
optical out outboard gear that is starting to come on the scene such as
the M-Audio Octane, Tango24, or Behringher ADA8000 that feature lots of
preamps w/ ADAT optical outputs, and just using the HDSP9652 as a really
nice signal router into my Linux box. Would anyone be willing to share
with me the pros and cons of this approach?
Up until now I have been thinking about sinking all of my money
into the MultiFace or a really high-priced audio card with minimal
outboard. Now I'm starting to think just the opposite that just using a
bare minimum optical card w/ decent converters and putting my money into
outboard would maybe be the best way. Any good advice on this, and if
so, any other cards I should consider?
Thanks very much,
gk
Hi,
I have whole directory of speech recordings with different volume levels.
I'm newbie to Linux and wonder what apps are there to do batch volume
normalization/scaling ?
Thanks,
Robert.
Hi. I've been playing guitar for 7 years or so, and using linux in one
way or another for about the same amount of time; but only this past year
have I started playing around with what I can do musically with my linux
box.
One of the things I've recently learned about is samplers. As I
understand it at this point (and I'm hoping someone will set me
straight if I'm wrong), a sampler accomplishes basically the same
thing as a wavetable synth -- it uses sound samples to generate
tones, doing frequency shifting and interpolation as necessary.
And as I understand it, the main difference between a sampler and
a wavetable synth is the lack of constraints on the samples used
-- with a sampler, anything at all could be a perfectly good
sample, including samples of almost arbitrary duration (and thus
size).
One of the most obvious uses I can see for a sampler would be to
use it to provide instrumentation that the user doesn't know how
to play. For instance, if I wanted to record myself on guitar
with a piano accompaniment, I could use a sequencer to write the
piano line and generate it through a sampler. But that brings my
first question -- if you don't own/play the instruments in question,
where do you get the samples? I've done a lot of web searching,
and found tons of drum loops and bass lines that are two measures
long and so forth, but don't find much in the way of e.g. individual
notes on basses.
And I wonder about how people use the extended samples I find.
It seems kinda constraining, to be stuck with a melody/harmony
line given to you by whatever someone sampled. Of course, there
are tons and tons of samples available; but then, in order to
express the music you're hearing in your head, you're gonna be
spending hours and hours trying to find samples that work.
Am I missing some obvious things here? How do people use samplers,
for the most part?
Thanks for dealing with my beginner-type questions.
-c
--
Chris Metzler cmetzler(a)speakeasy.snip-me.net
(remove "snip-me." to email)
"As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I
have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear
On
http://www.alsa-project.org/alsa-doc/index.php3?vendor=vendor-MAudio#matrix
there is the USB Audio Quattro, but the USB Audio Omni Studio is "untested".
On M-Audio site, they said that it's the same as Quattro with some
features more.
Do you know if OmniStudio USB works with Linux? (Debian)
Thank you
--
sigir
Hi,
I'm installing Suse 9.0 on an IBM T40 Thinkpad with a Digigram VXPocket
soundcard (for the third attempt...).
Suse cannot detect that the sound card is there (it sees the internal
card). When I try to override this and install manually, I get the
following message
An error occured during the installation of
VXPocket, Digigram
The kernel module snd-vxpocket for sound support could not be loaded. This
can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ
parameters.
Anyone out there have any thoughts on how to fix this problem? I've
exhausted everything I know of....
Thanks
-geoff
____________________________________________________
Geoff Martin Ph.D.
Tonmeister, Bang & Olufsen a/s
email: ggm(a)bang-olufsen.dk
web: www.bang-olufsen.com
web: www.tonmeister.ca
phone: +45 96 84 49 54
The Rosegarden team are pleased to announce the release of
Rosegarden-4 0.9.7, an audio and MIDI sequencer and score editor
for Linux.
http://www.rosegardenmusic.com/
The main focus of this release is to introduce a new, more accurate
and efficient audio layer with a mixer window, basic internal routing
capabilities, more complete plugin support, and support for the JACK
transport API.
This release also includes a number of other new features such as a
dedicated tempo and time signature editor window, segment summary
window, pitch-bend ruler, more useful controller rulers and various
new editing operations and keyboard shortcuts in the graphical editors.
Features of Rosegarden include:
o Score, piano-roll, event list and track overview editors
o MIDI and audio playback and recording with ALSA and JACK
o Audio plugin support using LADSPA
o Score interpretation of performance MIDI data
o MIDI file I/O, Csound, Lilypond and MusicXML export
o Clear and consistent KDE-based user interface
o Shareable device (.rgd) files to ease MIDI portability
o Translations into Russian, Spanish, German, French, Welsh,
Italian, Swedish and Estonian, as well as UK and US English.
Chris
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <nando(a)ccrma.stanford.edu>:
> Caveats: FC1 qt + dri + 2.6.4 + SCHED_FIFO = hanging machine, as
> reported a while back. Yuck. Turning off dri solves this one at the cost
> of no acceleration.
>
> With all the above I'm able to run Jack with SCHED_FIFO and no xruns in
> a short test run at 64x2 (with a background task tar'ing /usr to a
> file). But with DRI off, Qjackctl and some real Jack applications I do
> get xruns even at 128x2, I guess my cpu is maxing out...
I'm confused. I probably have misunderstood something, but: First you say,
that you get a "hanging machine" with SCEHD_FIFO enabled applications, but
later you say that you can run Jack with SCHED_FIFO with all the different
configurations/kernels you mention.
What do you mean with a hanging machine? Do you get 'random' lockups, or
does your system hang always when some specific software is run with SCHED_FIFO?
Do you get lockups with this kernel & setup (option d in your email)?
Could you give a list of specific patches (and urls) you have applied to
2.6.4-1.286.2.ll (option d), or maybe a link to the source package?
Sampo
Hi all.
a simple stupid question: in muse the tempo is in percentage?
or is 100 really 100 bpm? what is the rationale here?
Secondly when starting muse as a normal user I get:
cannot open rtc clock /dev/rtc: Permission denied
how can I change the permission permanently?
kernel 2.6 with realtime.0.04
Regards
--
antoine rivoire <antoine.rivoire(a)ntlworld.com>