Straightened it all out -- get error "they are already there!".
OK. (I do not expect the audio to work because Dman2044 is not yet supported
but...) how do I get my snd-usbmidi and snd-mpu401 to work? The mixer fails
on bootup (and on shutdown). proc/asound/cards has nothing.
On Thursday 19 February 2004 13:55,
linux-audio-user-request(a)music.columbia.edu wrote:
> David Baron wrote:
> > Contrary to popular belief, this kernel does not "come with" these
> > built in!
>
> Last time I looked, it still did come with ALSA. Â Which doesn't mean
> that it wasn't some obsolete version, so you might still want to
> compile ALSA separately.
The config file show nothing about ALSA at all. I would assume there would be
entries such as:
SND_******* y or m
Actually, modules are being loaded but they may be coming from the older
kernel. Alsa starts but the mixer fails to save or restore.
/proc/asounc/cards has nothing.
>
> > So following the instructions in:
> > http://www.linuxorbit.com/
> > modules.php?op=modload&name=Sections&file=index&req=viewarticle&artid=541
> >&page=1 (compiling on kernel-headers), I attempted to compile. cpp fails
> > sanity check. I upgraded all the gcc stuff. Same.
>
> Does this still happen if you simply run "./configure" in the
> alsa-driver package? Â If yes, what does configure.log say about this?
That rules thingie IS running ./configure. I get the exact same message.
The offender is this:
| /* confdefs.h. */
|
| #define PACKAGE_NAME ""
| #define PACKAGE_TARNAME ""
| #define PACKAGE_VERSION ""
| #define PACKAGE_STRING ""
| #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT ""
| /* end confdefs.h. */
| #ifdef __STDC__
| # include <limits.h>
| #else
| # include <assert.h>
| #endif
|
linux/limit.h does not exist. As I am compiling off HEADERS, I would expect
that the rules would define this directory as something. Usually, it is a
symlink to source. I suppose I could set this up myself--easy enough.
BTW, I tried to do this off source as well but got the same error. I did not
have the symlink.
Hi,
Idle JAMin (from current CVS) eats CPU: about 35%, if jack is started at 32/96,
and about 20%, if jack is started at 32/44.1. Such CPU consumption takes place
when there are no any jack client connected wih JAMin at all.
Is it normal?
Or - must I find something wrong in my configuration?
I have P4 2.4GHz, 512MB DDRAM 333MHz.
Andrew
Contrary to popular belief, this kernel does not "come with" these built in!
So following the instructions in:
http://www.linuxorbit.com/
modules.php?op=modload&name=Sections&file=index&req=viewarticle&artid=541&page=1
(compiling on kernel-headers), I attempted to compile. cpp fails sanity check.
I upgraded all the gcc stuff. Same.
So ...
Ahh, funny you should ask this. I have been experimenting with
both Fluxbox (http://www.fluxbox.org) and FVWM (http://www.fvwm.org)
under CCRMA (fedora). I originally went with fluxbox but, at least for
me, it actually had to much extra stuff (slit, tabs, icon bar). I really
only needed a root menu, hotkeys and a pager, after a bunch of looking
around I ended up with FVWM. Its learning curve is a bit daunting (this
is linux isn't it?) but that is sort of mitigated by 2 things: The sheer
amount of stuff you could do with it if you wanted, and the FVWM-themes
project (http://fvwm-themes.sourceforge.net)
Don't let the initial desktop scare you away from FVWM, it's so
customizable you can make it look and work like pretty much any other WM
out there. As far as resources go, neither of these are CPU hogs (FVWM
does have some modules that potentially can eat up CPU). Installed FVWM
takes up a bit more diskspace (even more so when using the themes
package), but once again not enough space to warrant immediate
dismissal. Fluxbox is much more easy to manage and it only took me about
an hour 2 to get a theme that I liked and a full set of hotkeys and a
CCRMA menu (the auto-menu scripts in both WM packages don't seem to find
the CCRMA stuff, so you will have to edit by hand, relatively painless
in fluxbox, a bit more time intensive in FVWM.)
m.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-audio-user-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu [mailto:linux-audio-
> user-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Kent, Gary
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 2:05 PM
> To: linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu
> Subject: [linux-audio-user] suggested Window Manager good for audio?
>
> Hi:
> I am trying out fvwm and it is pretty sparse, but was wondering
> what others might suggest as best for audio?
_________________________________________________
Scanned on 18 Feb 2004 22:30:28
Scanning by http://erado.com
Hi,
I've been wondering: what is it like processing audio offline under
Linux? Is this something that is widely supported? I did a bunch of
google searches using the term "offline" but couldn't find anything
really useful.
My computer is fairly weak (800 MHz laptop, no DSP card). Currently, if
I want to process a file (apply effects, change the sample rate, apply
dithering, mix it with another file, etc. etc.), I get the best results
/ greatest efficiency if I do disk bounces that don't require real-time
processing. Steinberg seem to be very proud that they now support this,
which suggests that it isn't the norm, at least under Windows (I don't
think Logic ever supported it under Windows).
I'm also curious if there's general support to process MIDI offline as
well, but that's not so critical to me, since the computations are far
less intense.
Cheers,
Chris
The second major of version of Specimen has been released today. The
main change is the new sample editor that allows you to fine tune the
way your samples are being played. I've also created some
documentation, and added ping-pong and reverse play modes.
Download it from www.gazuga.net, and read up on it at
www.gazuga.net/guide.
[pb]
Actually a new version was released on Sunday. Where did you hear about
the discontinuation?
m.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-audio-user-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu [mailto:linux-audio-
> user-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Mark Knecht
>
> I like XFE a lot also. I guess it's not being developed anymore? Pity
as
> it fills a nice void I think.
_________________________________________________
Scanned on 19 Feb 2004 00:05:16
Scanning by http://erado.com
Rox-filier's (http://rox.sourceforge.net/phpwiki/index.php/ROX-Filer
)Auto complete from the command line is pretty cool (I use it as an
image thumbnail viewer, its not so good as a full blow file manager as
it doesn't support multiple views). I don't usually use the command
input on xfe so I'm not going to be much help with that one.
m.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-audio-user-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu [mailto:linux-audio-
> user-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Winkler
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 4:12 PM
>
> While we're on the subject... do any of the graphical file managers
> do tab completion or something like it? I like the look of file
> managers but i don't like
point-click-point-click-scroll-click-point-etc.
>
_________________________________________________
Scanned on 19 Feb 2004 00:28:15
Scanning by http://erado.com