>To play soundfonts, would you go for a soundcard that can load them into
>its own RAM or for another solution ?
Try FluidSynth. It's a midi softsynth that loads SF2 font libraries. I think Timidity can load SF2 fonts as well, but I've only used it for GUS patch sets.
Hello,
I am looking for a good free soundfont to use with my SB Live! I've
been looking at the Hammersound page, but there are a lot of dead links,
and also several sfark files that may be good, but I don't think there
is a way to open sfark files under linux. Thanks for any suggestions
and links.
Maarten
Hi.
I released ZynAddSubFX 1.4.2 on
http://zynaddsubfx.sourceforge.net
News:
- (small) tutorials
- added full-featured, advanced formantic
filters
- added mixer panel which lets you to see/change
most important part settings, and shows a vu-meters
for each part
- you can choose to process the instrument's kit
items only with one Part effect (eg. you can make a
instrument kit that contains a reverberated piano and
flanged strings)
- enabled to launch more instances in Jack
- when is launched first time, it searches for
default.bnk_zyn file into /usr/share/zynaddsubfx and
/usr/local/share/zynaddsubfx directories (useful for
binary packages for Linux distributions)
- bugfixes
For those that you don't know, ZynAddSubFX is a
poweful software synthsizer for Linux and Windows.
Paul.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
What's the best/easiest/cheapest way to connect one or more keyboards to
a laptop? My own plans was one of the USB-keyboards, but:
*How well is USB-MIDI supported under linux in general?
*Which keyboards is known to work under linux?
*Is the response faster than with MIDI?
--
peace, love & harmony
Atte
Michel Dänzer escribio el 22/07/03 02:22:
> Probably a GTK bug, not related to this thread.
I know, I know... ;)
> Which isn't very surprising, as they can use parts of the graphics chip
> that we don't have specs for, for one.
Sure. Only I remember having installed Mandrake 9.1, and I think video
performance was somewhat better. Maybe I am wrong and memory cheats...
> Beware that at least the low latency patch needs fiddling with
> arch/ppc/config.in to actually be enabled (check with grep LOLAT
> .config), and that the preempt patch (which I assume you mean by R.
> Love's) actually made things worse for me when I tried it on PPC a while
> ago. This may have been fixed in the meantime though.
You're right! First line in the patch file says:
arch/i386/config.in | 3 +
So the patch to the config.in file is only applied automatically for the
i386 architecture. Indeed CONFIG_LOLAT_SYSCTL was not in my .config, so
should I paste this manually into arch/ppc/config.in? Would this be enough?
And about the preempt, patch, well, it seems I still have enough tests
to perform so I can spend my holydays safely.
> YMMV
IJLUW (indeed, just like using Windows!) ;)
Regards, Ismael
Michel Dänzer escribio el 21/07/03 13:09:
> First of all, you mentioned in another post that you use x11perf to
> create X11 stress. Are there also problems with real world apps?
"Real world" apps work properly (except for the Gnome theme manager
which displays garbage). I only find video performance using Linux a lot
lower than using any of the Mac OS's.
> Also keep in mind that neither the vanilla 2.4 kernel nor the X server
> were designed for low latency. Have you tried the low latency and/or
> O(1) scheduler kernel patches, and not running the X server with
> negative nice values if you are?
Both of those patches (A. Morton and R. Love's ones) were applied to my
kernel. I don't know about running the X server with different nice
values, which advantage would I get? (I am using gdm as my X session
manager).
> Last but possibly not least of all, the dmasound driver has been less
> prone to dropouts in my experience than the ALSA driver.
I should try with pure OSS. Let's not forget that the latency test suite
is using the OSS compatibility layer of ALSA.
Thanks a lot. Any feedback is still very useful.
Regards, Ismael
Hi,
I am trying latencytest-0.42-png.tar.gz for measuring latency on my
Apple G3 (Debian/Sid PowerPC). Of course I am enabling USE_GENERIC_TIMER
and tuning my hard disk using hdparam before tests. But, results show a
very poor performance. Indeed, any X11 stressing involves a raise of the
latency and lots of dropouts.
I can't blame hardware. Apple hardware is top-class, and this same
machine features under 1,5 ms of latency using CoreAudio on Mac OS X.
So, whether the PowerPC kernel or X11 are not fully optimized, or the
latencytest application is not reliable on non-Intel platforms.
Any ideas?
Sorry for crossposting... ;)
Regards, Ismael
I'm using an RME Digi96/8 PAD and I'm trying to configure ALSA so that when JACK loads it will provide transports to both the stereo device and the ADAT device on the card. I think the proper way to do this is by creating a virtual multi device but I can't find much info other than just an example on how to set it up. The multi device is easy enough to figure out, but I'm not quite sure how to set up the interleaved PCM stream correctly, the example given on the ALSA website is for a 4 channel setup and I need to set one up for 10 channels.
Here's my current .asoundrc:
pcm.rme_stereo {
type hw
card 0
device 0
}
ctl.rem_stereo {
type hw
card 0
device 0
}
pcm.rme_adat {
type hw
card 0
device 1
}
ctl.rme_adat {
type hw
card 0
device 1
}
pcm.multi {
type multi;
slaves.a.pcm rme_stereo;
slaves.a.channels 2;
slaves.b.pcm rme_adat;
slaves.b.channels 8;
bindings.0.slave a;
bindings.0.channel 0;
bindings.1.slave a;
bindings.1.channel 1;
bindings.2.slave b;
bindings.2.channel 0;
bindings.3.slave b;
bindings.3.channel 1;
bindings.4.slave b;
bindings.4.channel 2;
bindings.5.slave b;
bindings.5.channel 3;
bindings.6.slave b;
bindings.6.channel 4;
bindings.7.slave b;
bindings.7.channel 5;
bindings.8.slave b;
bindings.8.channel 6;
bindings.9.slave b;
bindings.9.channel 7;
}
ctl.multi {
type hw;
card 0;
}
Also, if there is a better/easier way to do this please tell me.
-Reuben
Hello list,
I successfully installed the Planet CCRMA CDs with all the applications on. However, I am desperate for one application called MIX (9-channel mixer from NoTAM)ported for Linux by Guenter Geiger. The reason is that I have done several pieces under that program in the University (on Unix System) and now being away of the University I cannot access them any more...
So far I tried the RPM from Planet CCRMA and the tarball from ftp://xdv.org/pub/gige/mix with lesstif lib included but the program opens with a couple of warnings;
"Warning: Cannot convert string "flat_foreground" to type SliderVisual" "Warning: No font found." and then crashes after I add some sounds. Some times it gives immediate segfault.
I would be very greatfull if any of you do run MIX without major problems under RH9, Planet CCRMA.
In fact all I want is to be able to load the files back and play them. I don't want the effects and the processing tools. I don't even want to record through that.
I would very much appreciate your help.
Thanks, Panayiotis
---
_____________________________
http://p.kokoras.tripod.com/
[last update 06 July 2003]
____________________________________________________________
Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail!
http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005