Hi,
I've been trying to compile csound on and off for the past two years and
was never really successful: the closest I ever got to a working csound
was a binary which would segfault every other run. So I gave it another
try yesterday and again ran across some difficulties.
Everything goes well enough until the linking stage at which point the
whole things gives up and starts spewing messages such as this one:
main.o(.text+0x341): In function `csoundMain': undefined reference to `POLL_EVENTS'
Now, it appears that POLL_EVENTS is somehow related to graph generation;
the problem is that I don't have any GUI installed on my system and
therefore don't want to have anything to do with FLTK, TCLTK or X11, and
it seems to be responsible for my problems. My question is: has anyone
ever successfully built csound without the graph generation pieces? Any
hint would be greatly appreciated.
More info:
sources: csound 4.23A from cs.bath.ac.uk
system: Debian (unstable tree)
compiler: gcc version 3.3.1
libc: glibc 2.3.1
Makefile:
# DEFINES: I tried with and without -DRTAUDIO and it didn't do
# much for me.
DEFINES = -DSFIRCAM -DSYS5 -DPIPES -DMACROS -DIV_SCHED -DRTAUDIO -DLINUX
# [...]
CFLAGS = -Wall -O2 -falign-loops=4 -falign-jumps=4 -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops -DWITHx87 $(RPM_OPT_FLAGS) $(DEFINES)
# [...]
LIBS = -lm -ldl
Regards,
S. Massy
Hi,
Hi. I asked this question on Alsa-Dev yesterday, but 17 hours later got
no answers. Excuse me to those that subscribe to both lists.
This info is to help me do more debug work on a new HDSP 9652 driver
version that I am helping to test.
Should the volume levels I hear when using the command
aplay -Dplughw:0 -r 44100 data/wave/seque~10.wav
be controlled by alsamixer?
The volumes for alsaplayer are being controlled by alsamixer, but this aplay
command is not, at least right now on a new driver I'm using.
Also, on a multichannel card, how do I direct the above aplay command to
a specific channel? I am finding that with this new driver the audio is
appearing on ALL channels on the card, even for a mono wave file. I think
this is a bug, but I'm not sure.
If there's an explanation fit for a simpleton like me about the
difference between plughw and hw and when to use one vs. the other, please
point me there so I can learn. I have read a bit on the Alsa site about
plughw talking directly to the kernel, but beyond that I have not discovered
any documentation yet.
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Mark
Hello all,
I am completely certain that what I am about to ask has been asked a million
times. But I am also rather tired of searching for answers for these things,
and I've been looking around on and off for something like a year. This list
is my best shot so far, so please excuse my ignorance and my laziness to keep
looking all by myself. Next to this mail I have another question, but I
decided to put that into its own mail to reduce confusion.
Quick description of what I WANT to do:
Compose music on my Linux system, playback MIDI files.
What I HAVE done in the past:
I've composed midis in windows for pretty much as long as I can remember.
Starting on an AdLib card, I have never bought myself any other hardware than
soundcards. I composed in MIDI only, using JazzWare (www.jazzware.com), which
I would be able to get for Linux as well of course.
What I HAVE in my computer right now is a Terratec DMXFire 1024. I assume I
will not be able to use the samples on that card according to what I've read
so far. I would *like* to keep composing in MIDI format, since I know that
pretty well by now. I realize I will probably need a software synth or
something like that and need to get myself patches from somewhere, and I have
found a number of pages online, but have been totally unable to find some
sort of VERY basic FAQ.
So exactly what do I need.. is MIDI the way to go at all still or should I
consider learning some other format (probably using some tracker like
software.. a finnish friend of mine exclusively uses Impulse Tracker on his
win box)? What Software Synth (if that is the name of the thing I will need)
will I need, what can you recommend? It would of course be best for all if
someone could just point me to a general FAQ and tell me to read the fabulous
manual.
Right now I'm also running ALSA 0.5.. there is some version of esound on my
computer as well. Things are rather confused, but my other mail will be on
that topic.
Thank you in advance for your patience and more importantly, your answers.
Daniel
Adrian Gschwend wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:33:10 -0400, Dave Phillips wrote:
>
> > Which Linux distributions include wxWindows in their default
> >installations ?
>
> used it on Debian and Gentoo so far, works nice.
>
> More here: http://www.wxwindows.org/distros.htm
>
> not sure if this is up to date however
According to the responses I've collected so far it seems it's a little
out of date.
My thanks to all who replied. It seems that it's a standard package with
most of the mainstream distros, with the interesting exception of Red
Hat. I haven't upgraded for quite a while, and wxWindows was not
included with my ancient 7.2 install. Is it not in 8.0 or 9.0 either ?
Best regards,
== dp
I have recorded into my system (DSP 2000 C-Port) using an effects pedall and it sounds OK but if I'm serious about it I use my tube amp with a pair of condeser mics. You can't get the "tube sound" out of an effects pedal (unless it's a tube pedal and even then it's 12AX7 not EL84/6L6GC/5881 sound). The boost in the even harmonics caused by tubes just hasn't been emulated (to my ears anyway). Maybe someday.
Jan
-----Original Message-----
From: "linux-audio-user-admin(a)music.columbia.edu" <linux-audio-user-admin(a)music.columbia.edu> on behalf of "Chris" <grooveman(a)comcast.net>
Sent: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 05:54:16 -0400
To: "linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu" <linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu>
Subject: [linux-audio-user] Direct In
Hello.
I am something of an old-school rocker, not so much of a
digital-techno-looper (although that stuff sounds fun too). I am
curious to hear how you guitarists out there handle your sound. Do you
all go direct in now? Or do some of you still mic your cabnet? I still
have not gotten my system together because of extenuating circumstances,
so I am still of the old school (namely, tape). When last I tried
(about 10 years ago) there was no good (and affordable) way to go
direct. Has that problem been solved in the modern Linux recording world?
My friend recently purchased an "all-in-one" unit from Roland, a 24
track 24 bit digital recorder, that cost him about $2,500 I think
(excluding cabling, mics etc). He says he goes direct -- and not only
direct but totally clean. All effects, including distortion are added
after the fact. He goes from his guitar into his recorder! This sure
seems strange to me, although I can understand the logic there. Is this
what you guys do?
I would love to hear how you all handle this. :0)
Thanks!
Chris
Hi
Is it possible to have csound output to jack? If not is there another
way to route audio from csound to other apps, I'm esp. interrested in
adding FX (mostly reverb/chorus)...??
--
peace, love & harmony
Atte
Hi!
I need people who want check gmorgan and email me if the program runs well,
especially if uses kernels 2.5.x or 2.6.0-test, or not Intel architecture.
Thanks
Josep