Linux-audio-user

linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

20702 discussions

by Stefan Ulbrich

hello, did anyone succeed to download the demudi 0.9 from agnula.org release? the download is terribly slow and breaks ab 5% =( are there alternative servers? thanx stef

23 years

[linux-audio-user] New relase of ZynAddSubFX (1.0.4)

by Nasca Paul

ZynAddSubFX is a open-source software synthesizer for Linux. It is available at : http://zynaddsubfx.sourceforge.net or http://sourceforge.net/projects/zynaddsubfx news: 1.0.4 - It is possible to load Scala (.scl and .kbm) files - Added mapping from note number to scale degree is possible to load Scala kbm files - Corrected small bugs related to Microtonal - If you want to use ZynAddSubFX with OSS (or you don't have ALSA) you can modify the Makefile.inc file to compile with OSS only. - It is shown the real detune (in cents) - Made a new widget that replaces the Dial widget - Removed a bug that crashed ZynAddSubFX if you change some effect parameters __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com

23 years

Re: [linux-audio-user] Scala

by manuel.op.de.coul＠eon-benelux.com

Hi Michal, >However, I will not be able to compile anymore for PPC as my mac died recently. Sorry to hear that! People who want a more recent PPC version will have to volunteer then. Manuel

23 years

[linux-audio-user] Scala

by manuel.op.de.coul＠eon-benelux.com

Perhaps not everyone has heard of Scala yet, here's the homepage: http://www.xs4all.nl/~huygensf/scala One remark: the Scala user interface may give the impression that OSS is supported, but it isn't yet. It will take me some more time to do that. But at least one can try the tunings with ZynAddSubFX now. Manuel

23 years

[linux-audio-user] Best CD Burners for DAE in Linux

by Terry Ewing

Hello, I've finally given up on cheap crap. I've come to realize that there is a point where I'm probably not going to need to burn a CDrom at a speed greater than 48x. I just don't care! Give me a 200 speed burner and I'll take the 48x for $10 cheaper. I've had an older HP burner finally die and I'm looking to replace it. I'm looking or some expert advice in getting the best one (not the cheapest, not the most features, but the best) CD Burner currently on the shelves of stores that I can use with Linux. I only burn a handful of CD's in a week but about 90% of the CD's I burn are audio CD's (not MP3's). I need to meet the following requirements: 1) Decent speed. 48x-24x-48x is about the range I'm looking for. If there is something faster than that I might take it. 2) Good Digital Audio Extraction speed. a 48x reader that extracts at 12x is unreasonable. 3) Good interaction with CDparanoia. This means that the -S speed setting should work (most drives ignore this) 4) No TOC skew. I doubt any recorder has TOC skew these days anyway. 5) Good interaction with CDRDAO to read-toc correctly and quickly with as few errors as possible 6) Good interaction with CDRDAO to write correctly and quickly with as few errors as possible. Burn-proof (or simlilar technology) is a must. CDRDAO must be able to utilize the burn proof tech in the drive. 7) Lower price wouldn't hurt, but isn't a big deal. If anyone can offer suggestions in the form of first hand experience, or pointers to good sources of info I'd appreciate it. FYI, If anyone is interested, I plan on doing the following: Use cdparanoia to grab the entire CD as one big wav file. Use cdrdao to make a TOC file from the CD. Use cdrdao to burn a copy with the wav file and the TOC. This will prevent any problems with silence between tracks on live albums and allow me to have a copy that CDDB/FreeDB can recognize. Write or find a simple shell script to take the .WAV file and .TOC and by starting and stopping at different points pass it through LAME to encode MP3's (one per track). Delete the .WAV and TOC after I've copied or MP3 encoded it as many ways as I see fit.

23 years

[linux-audio-user] Compilers

by Levi Burton

Greetings, I was curious what compiler versions people have had the best luck with. I am currently using: gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.3 2.96-113) I am considering upgrading via RPM to what appears to be 3.2 (gcc-3.2-7.i386.rpm). Good idea? Bad Idea? Thanks! Levi

23 years, 1 month

[linux-audio-user] mandrake 9.0 audio weirdness

by iriXx

the saga continues.... i ended up deciding that upgrade install was probably conflicting, so i formatted laptop and did a clean install of mandrake 9.0 sound now works first try, without having to compile modules.... but it sounds *really* weird...... all feedback-y noise.... does anyone have any idea what this might be? im using a usb-audio quattro on a thinkpad 600E thanx m~

23 years, 1 month

[linux-audio-user] [ANN] ALSA Patch Bay 0.4.1

by node＠users.sourceforge.net

Hi all, Another day.. another release :) * fixed plugin stuff to work with 2.9x C++ symbols * fixed fltk compile * added an alsa-patch-bay.desktop * fixed fltk segfault http://pkl.net/~node/alsa-patch-bay.html Bob

23 years, 1 month

[linux-audio-user] The Open Music Resource Library - Licensing

by Darren Landrum

Hello, all! I hope everyone had a good holiday season. As for me, I was busy moving into a new house (I'm a first-time homeowner, which is scary), so I've not had a chance to do any more work on the library. That will change now, however, as I now have my cable modem back, and a new broadband router to boot. :) I can now set up my older AMD 750 as a development server... Eventually. So now, it's down to brass tacks. I figured before I start to work in earnest on the technical aspects of the OMRL, that a good subject to tackle would be the required licensing of the content uploaded to the site. In reviewing this subject over previous emails, here are the conclusions I came to: 1) Users should be free to download, use, and redistribute for no cost any and all loops, samples/sample sets, and patches. 2) Users should be free to use any loops, samples, and patches in their final musical works, regardless of whether that final work is free or for-profit. 3) Users will *not* be free to download any loops, samples, and patches (raw materials) to package up and sell on a for-profit basis. Basically, you can use anything from the OMRL in your final product and sell it (or give it away), but you cannot sell any of the content of the OMRL itself, for example, selling a loop library CD containing loops from the library. Does this make sense to everyone? Would this be an acceptable solution to the problem? Thank you for all of your help and support. Regards, Darren Landrum

23 years, 1 month

[linux-audio-user] SpiralSynthModular 0.2.0

by Dave Griffiths

Hi everybody, SpiralSynthModular 0.2.0 is now availible for you to play with, the changes are much bigger than this little changelog suggests ;) Audio engine rewritten to be multithreaded Jack support via the JackPlugin --Realtime commandline option (as root) runs ssm audio in SCHED_FIFO LADSPA plugin much improved with built in GUI generator App help added with Helptext for all of the plugins One to many connections means the splitter plugin is now redundant Numerous fixes, additions and GUI improvements http://sourceforge.net/projects/spiralmodular/ http://www.pawfal.org/Software/SSM/ Happy new year! dave

23 years, 1 month

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Linux-audio-user