I think the idea of having an agenda is a good idea. Otherwise, when people
come - there is nothing there, but just people sitting with their laptops.
If there is an agenda, there is something to look forward to.
Another idea - is that we can actually record our meetings. And then post
it here, for other people to listen to the sessions. I can bring my Zoom
recorder and always record. We can even do videos, too.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:56 PM, <holger(a)dehnhardt.org> wrote:
6. Juli 2017 15:29, "Daniel Swärd"
<excds(a)kth.se> schrieb:
On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 17:41 +0200, Robin Gareus
wrote:
On 07/05/2017 01:05 PM, Daniel Swärd wrote:
Hi.
I'm once again hoping that we might get some people to the Linux
Audio
Berlin meeting. I'll be in the mainhall at c-base (Rungestraße 20)
from
20:00.
Cheers
Thanks for the reminder. I can't make it tonight, but I've put the
August 2nd down.
So, should we (if trying also to get some more people (yesterday I was
the only one showing up...)) maybe have an agenda or some discussion
topics to have it a little bit more organized?
- New software to try out?
- Old software that people should not forget?
- A jam session in the soundlab?
What do you think?
/Daniel
Hi Daniel and others,
I would like to talk about others experiences with session management:
Jack session, non session manager and ladish (the on I use) . In my opinion
this is one of the outstanding features of Linux audio but are there a lot
of peaople using it?
And why are they only supported by a small amount of applications?
I will not be there in August as I'm on holidays, but would like to see
this as a topic in September?
Holger
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user