On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:51:11 -0400
Brett McCoy <idragosani(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Joe Hartley
<jh(a)brainiac.com> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:19:02 +0200 (CEST)
"Patrick Shirkey" <pshirkey(a)boosthardware.com> wrote:
IMO Paul was right to come out full guns blazing
on this one. After
all
the effort that has gone into making Linux the most stable audio
platform
over the years it is very dubious behaviour for this person to come out
of
the blue with a direct challenge to the platform without even having
the
courtesy to discuss it first in the LAD list.
I found it odd that the klang developer has this thing for power
management.
My studio machine is not a laptop running on battery power, nor does it
have a heat problem. I really couldn't care less about whether my
audio
subsystem allows the CPU to throttle back. My latency is around 5ms, and
I
don't have any problem with routing apps through JACK. My studio
system
has been very stable for years now.
AFAIK, if you have your cpu governor set to 'performance', you
shouldn't have an issue with frequency scaling anyway. I have so much
stuff consuming power in my studio as it is, I doubt Jack is going to
make that much of an impact on it. :-)
What I find extremely disappointing about all of this is that we are not
exactly over-endowed with developers. Without casting stones in any
directions
this entire issue is a waste of talent and potential advancement.
--
Will J Godfrey
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org