3 Dec
2009
3 Dec
'09
10:06 a.m.
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 08:09 -0500, drew Roberts wrote:
On Thursday 03 December 2009 05:04:26 Ng Oon-Ee
wrote:
Yup, but not too difficult to have paid support for a distro that's not
owned/managed by a company.Right?
all the best,
drew
I guess. Doubt it'd be a good economic prospect in any case, considering
the user base either:-
a) doesn't need your help
b) needs your help but won't pay for it cos "OMGZZ THIS ISN'T WINDOWS
WHY SHOULD I PAY"
Disclaimer: I use Arch myself, and I know very very few users who fall
into b). Few isn't none, however =)
Oh, I was
thinking Golden Arch Linux would be the paid-support version
of Arch Linux.
Quite difficult to have a 'paid-support' version of a distro that's not
owned/managed by a company =).