7 Sep
2018
7 Sep
'18
4:49 p.m.
jonetsu <jonetsu(a)teksavvy.com> writes:
On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 14:25:04 +0200
Daniel Swärd <excds(a)kth.se> wrote:
No, it is to prove that not even the most direct search method
imaginable would have returned the article. Otherwise you can always
revert to "oh, you were using the wrong search terms for sure", "some
indexing glitch" or whatever rationale.
On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 07:36 -0400, jonetsu
wrote:
It's not a good test at all I find. Why would someone input the full
URL in a text search box as a test ? Is that supposed to mimic the
public access to information ? And I got pages full of links to many Reda
articles, including the
one she proclaims was blocked.
Maybe I did something wrong.
No, you didn't do anything wrong. It was blocked previously, but it
got fixed.
The whole point was the irony of an article about automated
censorship machines got blocked by such a machine... It does not represent public access to information at
all.
Sure. It shows that even if you try really, really hard to find the
article, the search will not be successful.
"I doubt you'll be able to bench press 10kg" "Dude, I just pressed
50kg"
"That doesn't seem like a realistic way to prove you could press 10kg".
--
David Kastrup