2 Aug
2012
2 Aug
'12
3:51 p.m.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Joe Hartley <jh(a)brainiac.com> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:19:02 +0200 (CEST)
"Patrick Shirkey" <pshirkey(a)boosthardware.com> wrote:
AFAIK, if you have your cpu governor set to 'performance', you
shouldn't have an issue with frequency scaling anyway. I have so much
stuff consuming power in my studio as it is, I doubt Jack is going to
make that much of an impact on it. :-)
--
Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.brettwmccoy.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it,
it would overturn the world."
-- Jelaleddin Rumi
IMO Paul was right to come out full guns blazing
on this one. After all
the effort that has gone into making Linux the most stable audio platform
over the years it is very dubious behaviour for this person to come out of
the blue with a direct challenge to the platform without even having the
courtesy to discuss it first in the LAD list.
I found it odd that the klang developer has this thing for power management.
My studio machine is not a laptop running on battery power, nor does it
have a heat problem. I really couldn't care less about whether my audio
subsystem allows the CPU to throttle back. My latency is around 5ms, and I
don't have any problem with routing apps through JACK. My studio system
has been very stable for years now.