Hi.
This sparked my interest, as I have missed that CM has gained RT
capabilities. As a non-GUI person, I played with
Csound (early 90s),
CM (around 2000) and
SC (from 2003 onwards).
Would you mind giving a short comparison of cm-incudine compared to SC?
Or, if you have no SC experience, could you highlight what you
particularily like about cm-incudine?
I ask because I speak Lisp fluently, so CM is still an interesting
option for me. I just left it behind since SC offered a much more
interesting RT experience, and the custom language feels pretty
concise. The last point is probably a strength and a weakness. sclang
is a nice language, but it is also unique, which means almost no library
reuse from other coders not involved in sound synthesis.
BTW, there is also cl-collider, which I recently discovered any played
with a little. I guess that is the main reason why I find it
interesting to re-evaluate CM.
Brandon Hale <bthaleproductions(a)gmail.com> writes:
Hello all,
Have you ever wanted to use cm-incudine, but felt like it was too hard
or too much work to install on your Arch Linux-based distro? Now you
can install it with
https://github.com/brandflake11/install-cm-incudine
<https://github.com/brandflake11/install-cm-incudine>. This script
will take you from zero to hero, installing emacs, slime, quicklisp,
and all of the dependencies needed for cm-incudine.
Hopefully this helps you install cm-incudine if you've ever been
interested, but couldn't figure out all of the smaller bits. Feedback
is welcome!
Thank you very much for your time,
Brandon Hale
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
--
CYa,
⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕