12 Apr
2012
12 Apr
'12
11 p.m.
Hi Q,
Ok I admit that the description of the area is very vague. The area is
from 02:31 to 03:47. And your right, expressiveness is not loudness.
So let me say more temperamentful, as this also includes the control of
tempo. But hearing it again (for the fourth time), forget what I said,
it's just great.
Regards,
Gerald
On Do, 2012-04-12 at 20:48 +0100, Q wrote:
Hi Gerald
Thanks for listening and commenting and I'm glad you enjoyed it.
Personally, I wouldn't call it masterfully played because the
microdynamics were not to my liking as I'm not a good enough player to
have adequate control over them. However, the gross dynamics are to my
liking and achieve what I set out to achieve. It's probably just a
slightly poor choice of words, but I'd take issue with equating loudness
with being expressive, or lower volumes as lacking expressiveness.
Although, to be fair, I'm guessing at the vague area that you're
referring to, because it wasn't clear -- a time index would have been
more useful.
Thanks again.
Cheers
Q
On 12/04/12 20:00, Gerald Mwangi wrote:
Hello Q,
All in all a very good piece and masterfully played. So my criticism is
on a high level: I would try to play way more expressive, forte than
piano from about 2/3rds of the piece. I believe at that point you play a
C^7/C# chord . From that point on I would play harder until the
F_minor^(#7) chord, then go soft again. (I'm using latex-style here:
F_(something) is F subscript something and F^(something) is F
superscript something ). hope you get my point.
But again: Very well done , I listened to it 3 times in a row!
Regards,
Gerald
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user