its only slightly more expensive than the behringer BUT has motor faders...
December 11 2016 11:19 PM, "Will Godfrey" <willgodfrey(a)musically.me.uk>
wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 22:29:53 +0100
Georg Krause <mail(a)georg-krause.net> wrote:
+1 for the bfc2k.
> but it's a Behringer...
It is. But in this case its not a big point, because there are no audio
quality issues or something like that. the midi signal has the same
quality, no matter where you save money. more important is: its class
compliant usb, its fully programmable, pretty robust (i dont have a
case, just put it in a bag to move it) and you can open it and adjust
the fader resistance ;)
the size may be a down side, but i can totally recommend it.
This actually looks very attractive indeed. I found an old Sound On Sound
review of it and apparently you can get a Java application for programming it.
This is platform agnostic.
I think I'd be taking rather a risk trying to order one before Christmas now,
but I'll certainly be giving it serious consideration in January.
Thanks for such a quick response guys.
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org