3 Aug
2014
3 Aug
'14
8:02 p.m.
2014-08-03 19:30 GMT+02:00 Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)rocketmail.com>om>:
On Sun, 2014-08-03 at 17:06 +0000, Fons Adriaensen
wrote:
Well, maybe next time I should just shut up :). Just for the record,
this information I learned from someone who was no newbie in this
matters.
--
C. sanchiavedraZ:
* NEW / NUEVO: www.sanchiavedraZ.com
* Musix GNU+Linux: www.musix.es
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 06:22:53PM +0200, Carlos
sanchiavedraz wrote:
Even if sound waves would behave like a ball thrown against the wall,
the nominal dispersion angle, the angles of the walls etc. pp. still
would be ignored by this mirror test, not to mention that we aren't
horses, with our eyes at the side of the head, were our ears usually
are.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user - Pick a mirror
- From your listening position perspective and moving the mirror (you
know, with its back to the wall), find the areas where you see the
image of your speakers reflected in the mirror. It's better to have
some helping hand so you can stay seated in your LP.
The point is: if you see the speakers/the light reflected from the
speakers that gets to your eyes bounced from the mirror, then the
sound will get to you bounced on those areas as well.
Take that with some very big lumps of salt.
For at least half of the audible frequency range, the wavelenght of
sound is comparable or larger than the typical sizes of objects that
surround us. Which means that sound will not behave as light. This is
the main reason why so many people have a completely wrong idea of how
sound waves interact with objects or a room.