11 Dec
2008
11 Dec
'08
8:09 a.m.
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 01:03:48PM +0100, hollunder(a)gmx.at wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:13:38 +0100
torbenh(a)gmx.de wrote:
But is the lossy codec (celt) a good idea for a LAN?
of course its not.
i was talking about wireless here, which is losing packets,
and celt can compensate for packet loss.
celt-0.6.0 at 512kbit/s should be the way to go for such setups.
i dont think that the quality reduction, will be audible, at such
bitrate. And the packet losses would only degrade quality,
but thats better than clicks and pops due to lost packets.
--
torben Hohn
http://galan.sourceforge.net -- The graphical Audio language