17 Aug
2017
17 Aug
'17
5 p.m.
OMFG.
How many years have to go by before people stop thinking that nice values
have anything to do with this?
http://jackaudio.org/faq/linux_rt_config.html
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mikes(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi,
I am afraid that I still don't understand limits.conf file properly.
Hopefully someone can explain me some details.
I have limits.conf file like this:
@mira - rtprio 99
@mira - memlock 8000000
@mira - nice -10
@mira /usr/bin/jackd nice=-1 rtprio=85
@mira /usr/bin/qjackctl nice=-1 rtprio=84
@mira /usr/bin/ardour nice=-1 rtprio=83
@mira /usr/bin/hydrogen nice=-1 rtprio=82
@mira /usr/bin/jackeq nice=-1 rtprio=81
@mira /usr/bin/jack-rack nice=-1 rtprio=80
.
.
Should I do something better with nice and rtprrio values to ensure better
RT robustness ?
There is also possible add "priority" value in limits.conf file ... Should
I use it?
2nd question:
In qjackctrl Settings -> Advanced ... there is a "Priority" option ...
How it is connected with these above? Should be used?
mira
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user