1 Aug
2012
1 Aug
'12
6:55 a.m.
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 01:02:56AM +0400, Louigi Verona wrote:
I carefully read what this guy wrote. It does sound
like a reasonable
attempt.
klang's author doesn't know JACK!
!! JACK has the right design, but consumes just to much CPU
!! and kills power efficiency. Also it doesn't cope well with
!! coarse scheduling.
JACK *is* efficient, consumes scarcely a couple percent CPU
on my system.
Not sure what the last sentence means.
--
Joel Roth