15 Jul
2010
15 Jul
'10
11:33 a.m.
Bristol looks grand, everything is layed out before you on a single screen
(for nearly all the synths) and it functions fine. Zynaddsubfx on the other
hand.... Quite complex, but very flexible.
But comparing the looks of a synth to a sequencer? lol wut?!
Andrew
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Dear fons, perhaps. It is, after all, a matter of
taste. I like Qtractor
GUI a lot,
it is inspiring. But I like Wired too, to be honest.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:01 PM, <fons(a)kokkinizita.net> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:25:32AM +0100, James
Stone wrote:
--
Louigi Verona
http://www.louigiverona.ru/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
I think you hit the nail on the head - the
graphics are really nice on
wired - unlike most of the other linux apps (with possible exception
of bristol, renoise etc.)
/me looks. ? ?? ??? IMHO it looks 'cheap plastic', and surely
not as any piece of HW I'd trust. Lots of ugly and completely
disfunctionalo eye candy.
Qtractor looks at least 30 dB better to me, as does Renoise.
Ciao,
--
Je veux que la mort me trouve plantant mes choux, mais
nonchalant d’elle, et encore plus de mon jardin imparfait.
(Michel de Montaigne)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user