16 Apr
2007
16 Apr
'07
11:30 p.m.
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 12:34 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
lanas hat gesagt: // lanas wrote:
Do you know if this bug is solved in the current pd-extended cvs?
-- Fernando
Le Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:28:31 +0200,
Frank Barknecht <fbar(a)footils.org> a écrit :
No, I'm talking about real 64-bit Pd. There was a nasty bug with the
arrays and [table]s, when Pd was compiled for 64 bit. This seems to be
solved AFAIK. At least there's an amd64 package for Pd in Debian with
no open bug reports in regard to arrays. Note that most recent versions of Pd finally do
run okay on 64 bit, I
guess starting with 0.40. I didn't try myself, though.
Do you specifically mean the 32 bits packages running on a 64-bit
platform ?