7 Sep
2009
7 Sep
'09
11:23 a.m.
2009/9/7 Ray Rashif <schivmeister(a)gmail.com>
JFS is low-latency, low-power, and all-around
performer. As such, it suits
a mobile platform with 5400RPM disks.
Oops, forgot to continue:
For speedier and larger disks, ext3/4. Both XFS and ReiserFS have their
cons. Google and you'll land upon a pretty old review, but JFS and EXT3 come
up ahead of the others.