10 Sep
2018
10 Sep
'18
8:22 p.m.
Le Fri, 7 Sep 2018 08:29:45 -0400,
jonetsu <jonetsu(a)teksavvy.com> a écrit :
On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 14:25:04 +0200
Daniel Swärd <excds(a)kth.se> wrote:
Maybe because she is some geek using some well know open source OS with
so many different tool-kits than when she's clicking on an url, she
never knows what will append.
On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 07:36 -0400, jonetsu wrote:
It's not a good test at all I find. Why would someone input the full
URL in a text search box as a test ? Is that supposed to mimic the
public access to information ? No. Very, very strange way of proving
any point at all. The lady might have good arguments, I haven't read,
but this test is very much on the lame side of things I find. Why
would someone with solid arguments do such a test ? And I got pages full of links to many Reda
articles, including the
one she proclaims was blocked.
Maybe I did something wrong.
No, you didn't do anything wrong. It was blocked previously, but it
got fixed.
The whole point was the irony of an article about automated
censorship machines got blocked by such a machine...
It does not represent public access to information at all.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
--
If you have a problem and you are not doing anything to fix it, you are
at the heart of the problem.