On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 07:04:20AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 01:57:40PM -0400, Lee Revell
wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 04:30 +1200, Chris
Bannister wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 11:47:16AM -0400, Lee
Revell wrote:
Didn't Sarge ship with the horrible NPTL 0.60
bug?
That should be reason enough to use Ubuntu, Debian does not seem to mind
shipping completely non-working packages.
Did you file a bug?
Yes:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266507
It's been marked "fixed upstream" since February.
It's been marked "fixed upstream", but still not fixed?
Pester them. Refile it. It's archived in the BTS so hopefully 'shoddy'
maintainers will get noticed.
Sorry to reply to my own post, but the fix seems to be:
<quote>
--- nptl/pthread_create.c~ 2003-09-09 03:17:15.000000000 -0400
+++ nptl/pthread_create.c 2004-08-17 21:48:47.000000000 -0400
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@
/* Determine scheduling parameters for the thread.
XXX How to determine whether scheduling handling is needed? */
- if (0 && attr != NULL)
+ if (attr != NULL)
{
if (iattr->flags & ATTR_FLAG_NOTINHERITSCHED)
{
Please apply.
</quote>
Is that for libc6 or the 2.6 kernel?
--
Chris.
======