Hi Bill,
On 11/05/2021 16:11, Bill Purvis wrote:
On 11/05/2021 15:04, Robert Jonsson wrote:
With my band we will try Jamulus as as soon as we
find the time.
https://jamulus.io
This far I have installed and played around with it. A bit rough
around the edges but looks like with some massaging it could do the
trick nicely.
I took a look at it and I think its under false pretences - it would
seem
that each person operates in isolation, with a 'master track' to play
along with,
then the server adds the various tracks together to produce the final
version.
Low-latency doesn't really come into it unless my understanding is
way off.
if I get your meaning quite right you are indeed way off. You don't
work with a
master track. All musicians are playing life into their local
installed jamulus
client, each clients sends the local audio stream to a server (could
be any of
the freely available or a self hosted one) and the mix is
re-transmitted back to
each member. This works very well for a round trip latency up to about
40 ms,
above that its not really fun.
Our test have been partly good partly bad. If the participants are in
totally
different networks (e.g. Cable and DSL (don't know the correct English
names))
over all latency was above 100 ms and rehearsal wasn't possible but if
all
participants are in the same network (here e.g. DSL deutsche Telekom)
latency
has been about 30 - 40 ms and rehearsal was fine.
For sure you must use headphones and LAN to your router (no wireless, no
Bluetooth) to minimize latency as much as possible.
hope that helps
Gerhard
My Apologies!
I intended it to refer to Choirless, not Jamulus!
To hasty on my part....
Bill
--
+----------------------------------------+
| Bill Purvis |
| email: bill(a)billp.org |
+----------------------------------------+