13 Oct
2007
13 Oct
'07
2:14 p.m.
Ok, that will explain it.
I'm using jack applications, like Hydrogen, Rosegarden, Ardour, and none
of them is lash-ed, i believe.
thanks,
Lobo
Dragan Noveski wrote:
Ricardo Lobo wrote:
Hi People,
I have two questions, or maybe we can call it, surveys.
First: Is there anyone here who uses LASH? I tried it but I didn’t
found it useful, am I missing something?
hallo, for me lash is running good for muse, seq24, specimen and glashctl
the problem that i see is that not that much jack clients are lash-ed.
cheers,
doc
Second: Yesterday I was told to try the OSS V4.0,
because it is – or
so I was told – better than ALSA. It goes against what I think to be
the common opinion around here.
Thanks,
Lobo
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user