27 Feb
2006
27 Feb
'06
10:06 p.m.
tim hall wrote:
Yes, but you can't release those pieces under cc
licenses unless you
have control of copyright. You lose copyright then you lose the right
to license those pieces altogether. Being an amateur is a middle-class
luxury.
To me, being an amateur is to make art for the sake of art. and being a
pro its just a job.
If you're right, for similar reasons, maybe also coding software and
releasing it as open source should be a middle-class luxury. Is this the
case? I don't think so.
And anyway, how does this thread about copyright and open source relate
to being an amateur?
c.
--
www.cesaremarilungo.com