On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:50:39PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 10:16 +1000, Ryan Heise wrote:
I recall you said once that installing 2.6.13 is
a "terribly bad idea"
if you want a stable machine. You also mentioned that 2.6.12 was quite
stable.
That was in reference to 2.6.13 + the -rt patches, which are highly
experimental, not 2.6.13 vanilla.
Do you now recommend 2.6.13 or 2.6.12? What is
the "debian way" to
install 2.6.13? Is there a package?
Same way you installed 2.6.11 just use the
2.6.13 package. If there's
no debian kernel source package for 2.6.13 yet then just install it the
old fashioned way - build it then and make install.
Or, configure it,
make-kpkg kernel_image
dpkg -i <kernel_image>.deb
--
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki | Systems Administrator
Technical Operations Division | Radio Free Asia
2025 M Street, NW | Washington, DC 20036 | 202-530-4900
CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION
This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the addressee and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Any
unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly
prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact
network(a)rfa.org.