12 Dec
2016
12 Dec
'16
12:46 a.m.
Also the Launch Control series from Novation is quite interesting. I own an
XL (which has 24 knobs, 8 faders and 16+8 buttons); while it is not
programmable from Linux (yet), I started a project some months ago, which
aims to use a program as a sort of "proxy": this means that you connect the
Launch Control to my program, and then connect it to your software(s),
instruments and so on, also allowing some advanced behavior over MIDI
(multiple toggle states, trigger more than one button at a time...) and
obviously led programming.
It might not seem very easy in the beginning, but once you've configured
your templates, it's very useful, expecially in live.
If you are interested, I wrote a small post here (with some screenshots and
explaination on how it works):
http://jidesk.net/post/nolae-a-novation-launchcontrol-editor
Cheers
2016-12-11 23:56 GMT+01:00 <till(a)www.n0ne.de>de>:
yeah, an omission / typo: the icon has _touch
sensitive_ motorized faders,
the behringer not. i find this to be quite if you are doing something in
latch mode and dont want to wiggle the faders all the time to get keyframes
recorded.
December 11 2016 11:52 PM, "Georg Krause" <mail(a)georg-krause.net> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
--
È difficile avere una convinzione precisa quando si parla delle ragioni del
cuore. - "Sostiene Pereira", Antonio Tabucchi
http://www.jidesk.net
The behringer also has ;)
Am So. Dez. 11 23:27:41 2016 GMT+0100 schrieb till(a)www.n0ne.de:
> Anyone ever tried stuff from this Icon company?
> http://iconproaudio.com/product/platform-m
>
> its only slightly more expensive than the behringer BUT has motor
faders...
>
> December 11 2016 11:19 PM, "Will Godfrey"
<willgodfrey(a)musically.me.uk>
wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 22:29:53 +0100
>> Georg Krause <mail(a)georg-krause.net> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for the bfc2k.
>>>
>>>> but it's a Behringer...
>>>
>>> It is. But in this case its not a big point, because there are no
audio
>>> quality issues or something like
that. the midi signal has the same
>>> quality, no matter where you save money. more important is: its class
>>> compliant usb, its fully programmable, pretty robust (i dont have a
>>> case, just put it in a bag to move it) and you can open it and adjust
>>> the fader resistance ;)
>>>
>>> the size may be a down side, but i can totally recommend it.
>>
>> This actually looks very attractive indeed. I found an old Sound On
Sound
>> review of it and apparently you can get a
Java application for
programming it.
>> This is platform agnostic.
>>
>> I think I'd be taking rather a risk trying to order one before
Christmas now,
but I'll certainly be giving it serious
consideration in January.
Thanks for such a quick response guys.
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user