20 Oct
2010
20 Oct
'10
9:22 p.m.
Lovely to hear JACK1 is better than ever but I was told that JACK2
would support SMP better than JACK1. Would better SMP support in J2
lead to more efficient handling and processing wrt plugins ie LADSPA's
or maybe even the ability to squeeze more tracks out of your hardware?
If not, why JACK2?
Thanks PD!
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:06 PM, allcoms
<allcoms(a)gmail.com> wrote:
. Please try this combo of apps
neither torben nor myself use jack2. jack1 is more stable than ever.
are you expecting something?
with JACK 1 SVN or JACK2 but I personally am more
interested in JACK1
as it is reportedly more stable and xrun-packed than JACK2. I haven't
actually done any real testing with JACK2 yet but that was the case
last I asked Torben about this and so I just took his word for it.
That should've read 'less xrun-packed' of course.
Has anyone done any testing wrt performance and stability of JACK1 vs
JACK2 recently? Be nice is Paul or Torben could give us a brief
update on this.