1 Dec
2010
1 Dec
'10
8:23 p.m.
On 02/12/10 01:03, Robin Gareus wrote:
Hi Batz,
just a quick re:
On 12/01/2010 02:29 PM, Batz wrote:
> [ .. ]
> Yoshimi looked really interesting. It looks as though you can use
> samples as oscillators which could be what I'm after. [ ... ]
Nope, it can't do that! Well, yet ...
AFAIK, Yoshimi is still under heavy development and
not ready for
prime-time, yet.
Not entirely true. I'd consider 0.058.1 stable, and 0.060.1 is a minor advance
on that with no threats to that inherent stability. There's been a steady stream
of experimental versions, always tagged "-preX", so I suspect you're
assessment
is based on their reputation. Some of those experimentals have been erratic (to
put it kindly), not so 0.058.1/0.060.1.
cheers.