> A musician can be trained to mentally separate
the parts of an
> orchestra; why could not a machine do the same ?
>
@daemian
There isn't just a big leap from machine to musician but also: You can
focus on (not seperate) certain instruments to quasi-isolate the
important part. Thats just a question of pratice. schoappied asked for a
program to "switch off" certain instruments which i doubt even a
conductor is able to do inside his brain.
And when i said it's impossible, i thought of the possibilities that are
currently available. You could be right: This hasn't to be impossible at
all but imho under some strong assumptions:
- we are able to collect and compute all the necessary information with
our senses and brain to perform this "switch off" ( i doubt that )
- we would learn what these information are
- we could teach a machine to do that
Thus, i think it would need a lot more, especially imagination :)
@schoappied
I forgot to ask: What do you want to do with the isolated tracks anyway?
Maybe there's another work-around.
--
Best regards,
Sebastian.
Web: linuxaudioblog.sternenhejim.de
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 19:30 +1100, simon wise wrote:
On 23 Feb 2008, at 10:48 AM, Jean-Baptiste Mestelan
wrote:
(I'm not
implying it would be trivial, though ;-)
it's a big leap from machine to musician!
It is hard enough to get a machine to be a good
instrument for a
musician to play, let alone to analyse a sound as a musician would.
Still, what a machine does now would have been sci-fi to most people
just 20 years ago.
simon
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user