1 Feb
2004
1 Feb
'04
9:55 p.m.
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Rob hat gesagt: // Rob wrote:
as well as good practice for about the same number of reasons
Ron's contrite response to my original flame
suggests to me that
he got bit by the infamous "reply-to: set to mailing list"
behavior so many have complained about.
I must have missed this complains, but until now I also missed, that
the Reply-to is indeed munged. As this is considered bad practice for
a lot of reasons (search google for "reply-to munging
harmful")
search google for "reply-to munging considered useful" :-D
and as
it isn't done on most other lists I'm on, I'd like to ask the admin
(hi, J.) to turn the munging off, if no one else complains.
well, personally i like the reply-to, and imho that's exactly what
it's for. we've had this discussion a couple times iirc. but then,
if you want to vote again, be my guest.
--
"I never use EQ, never, never, never. I previously used to use mic
positioning but I've even given up on that too."
- Jezar on http://www.audiomelody.com
Jörn Nettingsmeier
Kurfürstenstr 49, 45138 Essen, Germany
http://spunk.dnsalias.org (my server)
http://www.linuxaudiodev.org (Linux Audio Developers)