17 Mar
2010
17 Mar
'10
8:52 a.m.
On 3/17/10, Ray Rashif <schivmeister(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 17 March 2010 17:20, Andras Simon
<szajmi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, you're probably right on both counts. And no auto-update is of
course appealing for those who don't want auto-updating. But these
users should be able to find out in a few minutes how to remove this
feature.
Andras
On 3/17/10, Stephen Stubbs
<theother1510(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Actually that can be configured in every package manager's GUI
front-end (if not then that front-end itself shouldn't exist). But I
suppose what was meant was that the default behaviour of not
auto-updating (or having a GUI front-end) is appealing. The other thing I like about Arch Linux is that
it doesn't automatically
check for updates, and it doesn't try to push updates on you. Now that I
It's a minor point, but still: Fedora doesn't do this either. It's
PackageKit (or some such) that does, and it can be safely removed (or
not installed in the first place).