18 Nov
2010
18 Nov
'10
11:10 p.m.
Em quinta-feira 18 novembro 2010, às 20:05:27, você escreveu:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 07:28:04PM -0200, Fabio
wrote:
well I refered to Number 2 as 1 + 2 say diferent things
Em quinta-feira 18 novembro 2010, às 18:37:30,
fons(a)kokkinizita.net escreveu:
On the contrary, the test showed that the listeners could *not* hear
the difference.
Ciao,
For these tests the authors used
'audiophile' DVD-A recordings
(mostly classical music and jazz IIRC), all of them 24-bit, 96
or or 192 kHz, and had the listeners compare them to a version
transcoded to CD standards (44.1 kHz, 16 bit). Two results
emerged from this:
1. Nobody could hear any difference between the original recordings,
reproduced using the best equipment available, and the transcoded
versions.
2. Almost all listeners preferred the 'audiophile' recordings to
other versions of the same music released on CD.
well, you sure loose quality downsampling to 16bit, that's what they heard