20 Jun
2005
20 Jun
'05
9:28 p.m.
Atte André Jensen <atte.jensen(a)gmail.com> writes:
No, I reccomend debian+demudi (man, I really am not clear).
Michal Seta wrote:
Sorry, I was not clear. Why switching to ubuntu?
>I'm currently running debian/unstable with
my home-made-but-unpatched
>kernel 2.6.11-10, but is considering switching to ubunto.
Why?
Basically because unstable is sometimes a bit too unstable for me (and
stable is too old, or at least was a month ago...). I don't think there will be any difference.
I have installed ubuntu
on a machine (because it was the only distro that worked on that
particular hardware out-of-the-box) and I cross-bred it with Demudi
and Debian (which has created a whole other set of conflicts and
problems). Add demudi to your apt sources and install the multimedia
kernel if you don't want the hassle of patching and compiling
yourself.
So you've had problems with demudi on ubunto? And still recommend it, why? Let's see. The impression I get (from my LUG, for
instance) is that
quite a lot of hardcore debian/gentoo users have switched, and are
praising ubunto quite a lot.
Meybe I'm not hardcore enough. For new users it's a great distro, I have not been
impressed in terms of trying to do audio.
Anyways, I just ordered another HD, so I'll
install ubunto on that and
see how bad it is...
the best way to go.
./MiS