Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I anyone is feeling creative and wants to take a stab at making a
> new animated gif logo for the quicktoots it would be very helpful.
>
> The old one is getting tired and I don't have any ideas for a new
> one right now.
>
>
>
One kind person has taken some time to make a logo. This may give
someone else some ideas. I like the direction but I think it could
be taken further.
http://quicktoots.linuxaudio.org/?t=2
Cheers.
I have received a new set of logos with a different angle from the
previous one which is very apt. I have put them online for
discussion and maybe they will inspire someone else to have a go too.
http://quicktoots.linuxaudio.org/?t=2
*Ideally I would like to have an animated logo that fits into the
header space so please keep it in mind while designing. Of course
if you don't feel up to doing the animation but still have a good
idea for the static image that is not a problem as we can always
animate it later.
The new one is much better IMHO. Maybe the teacher should have some
music notes and linux commands on his white board?
This can be arranged.
To be honest. Those animated logo's don't
do any good. Very
irritating and disturbing, not a good idea IMHO
I appreciate your sentiment but the final version is definitely gonna
be animated.
That would be a bad thing IMHO.
To be honest, the frontpage of the quicktoots almoste even bad ad the
most brutal advertisement website with all those thing flashing in your
face (...exaggeration...) .
Ok, your content is far from 'brutal' ;), but it is the same when its
comes to irritating flash/ animated/ moving things. Anyone specialist
would say this is a bad thing to do on a website, unless you want to
earn quick money and put some animated nude woman in your website... :/
I like the idea of the website! :) , but when it comes to the logo, I
only see disadvantages of (to much) animated stuff there.
Regards,